Jump to content

Welcome to Pure Warfare - The #1 Community for Pures

Welcome to Pure Warfare - The #1 Community for Pures, like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be apart of Pure Warfare - The #1 Community for Pures by signing in or creating an account.
  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get email updates
  • Get your own profile page and make new friends
  • Send personal messages to other members.

Fat_DemonPK

Member
  • Posts

    1630
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Fat_DemonPK

  1. The amount of people on here who have no idea what they're talking about....

     

    F2P:

     

    MM

    Fi

    Foe

     

    P2P:

    Foe

    fi

    MM

    lmfao

     

    I'm referring to the people who keep talking about Fi's "5 year slump". I swear the slump gets longer every time I hear about it. First it was like a year, now its 5???

    It was really like 3-4 years, mm just added another year because they can? I guess.

    it was really just 2 years aka 2010 and 2011 when 101 sins was leading

  2. 140 pull and you only got 130 kills?

     

    donate $2 to starving mm kids today

     

    flaming them for only killing you 130 times?

     

    you gon' and reached a new level of dumb

    hey jonty =] remember when your clan was relevant? ah the days

    Remember when your clan slumped and no1 cared about them?

    remember when ur clan thought they were good but then they lost

    again and again and again and again then they won and thought they were really good then they lost again and now they cant even flame on pw

    he's in your clan dude

  3. FOE beat mm in p2p too what a surprise.... history wont change

    except MM can beat them in P2P, unlike FOE which hasn't beaten MM in F2P in years I'd say

    neagtory foe have just as much chance as beating you in f2p then you have of beating them in p2p obviously your biased

    you're

  4. You must all forget that MM is the only pure clan out of the big dogs, whether you like it or not your clans have had to adapt to gain an advantage or each respective rivals, truth is that. You can say to enjoy the game but you are blinded by that and with two weeks left till this won't matter its ok to admit that. With that being said MM has beaten clans that have 2x and even 3x their defence average in F2P, their history alone will grant them #1 F2P even if they lose a F2P fullout 0-3 with the other clan having 100 ending. Consistency and a model of great community to all for the pure community.

     

    F2P

    MM - for the above

    FI - their ceiling was actually holding #1 f2p at one point, then having that taken from MM

    FOE/EOP - EOP was dominent at one point in this server, EOP were never really smart, they tried to mess with the top dogs MM and the following months they became irrelevant, the propaganda was hard and to a point no longer influential, got boring and old. FOE now they are a shell of themselves, prob due to **** leadership, but were powerful for few summers into fall

    CP - for longevity and decent memories, has won full outs and managed to pull 100+ a few weeks in row in early 10 I believe?

     

     

    P2P

    FOE - Has been solid throughout this whole era, been undefeated in P2P, even though they only had like 4-5 fullouts? Never wanted to put their title at risk, unlike MM who accepted every war came @ them. Pretty weak but w/e, MM would be giving them a run weren't for 30 def and ****.

    MM - Wasn't really good at P2P early, got better but the mains were too much for the pures, great pulls amazing history in this server as well, highest P2P pull ever for a pure clan not merged or whatnot.

    FI - That loss to FOE 74-91 I believe was huge to the middle part of your history, what if you won. Meh would have been the opposite maybe you would be #1 P2P and have been MM's biggest rival, you will have to settle for top 3 in this ranking. Been great past few months, but consistency my sons. Again their defence has helped them gain an advantage over clans that accept 35 def

    you do realise foe was in single in the 74v91

  5. EOP have never won a fullout, and have lost twice to Fatality.

     

    Fatality was top for the entirety of 2007, and has been amongst the top 3 more regularly than EOP.

     

    Overall F2P

     

    1. MM

    2. FOE

    3. FI

    4. Epidemic

    5. EOP

     

    Overall P2P

     

    1. FOE

    2. Fi

    3. MM

    4. TLP

     

    Nice list, however both your statements are incorrect.

     

    Nice reply, however your statement has no valid explanation just a meaningless point with nothing to back it up.

     

    EoP have won multiple fullouts (as pointed out numerous times but clearly you Fi lads are just ignoring it as you're so starved of action you have nothing better to do than attempt to troll on PW with incorrect facts).

     

    Also, the 2012 fullout between EoP and Fi is pretty much known as complete nonsense, considering EoP had a +12 lead in round 3 until their teamspeak was ddosed (and Fi's ts was never ddosed at any stage), so it's hardly a barometer of how good each clan is.

     

    Fi weren't top for the entirety of 2007, EoP was top for a large portion of it.

     

    Fi weren't a top 3 clan for 4 years while you pulled 10 to mandatory events and had to have inners in clan wars instead of trips, while we were actually fighting mm/foe/e for #1, slumping dp and cp, and you know...having trips.

    nice post but it is incorrect sorry

×
  • Create New...