Nippon

1st. Gj FOE. You were the only clan that cleared my team today :ermm:

A challenger appears

Losing is not an option; we will **** lightning and **** success.

Looks like EOP continuing the crashbattlemidwayandclaimwin -spree, tho it seems FOE mostly got you in the end. Gj on your trip.

GJ CP, although you didn't clear EOP by yourself. Nevertheless, I don't see how EOP can complain when they havent won a fight without crashing either. Also thx for loots all clans :happy:

You make no sense at all. Some english lessons before next post plz

Ima bump this because I can.

Ridiculous pull... I wonder when a clan will gain enough numbers to match you on the p2p server. FI had 48 when we ran past you, ~35 made it to clw thanks to Davey's unmatched running skills.

Was unfortunate that you kept hunting MM throughout your trip as we were trying to set up a run-in with them :confused:

U guise...

22 opts is 7 people and a third of a person.

I was just about to say that. Damn 09 pkers.

Anyway, gj on your trip.

yeh i agree with you guys, its a good thing but a bad thing at the same time, some people dont realize that it IS a gateway drug, since i started smoking weed, iv tried pretty much anything u can think of, pills, acid, meth all that ****, tbh im not sure what it should be, i would like to have it legal, but things could go wrong. so who knows.

It's not a gateway drug, you're just one of those people who will try anything you get your hands on. People like you would first start with what is most easily available, usually it's alcohol and tobacco (cannabis in some areas), then you progressively move towards harder substances. If cannabis didn't exist in the chain you would end up using the same stuff just the same, so it's ridiculous to argue that cannabis has some special "gateway attributes" that guide you towards other substances.

The plant itself is not in any way a gateway drug, if there is any reason to call cannabis use a gateway of a sort, it is because of its social status and the related drug culture.

It's not like its hard to get anyway. But i think if it was legalized and became accepted in society, people who now realise it's not at all dangerous might start trying out harder stuff, which can be dangerous, and i think thats the main concern.

The gateway theory as it stands has little to no scientific value. There is no reason to assume that the use of hard drugs would increase if only cannabis was legalized. On the contrary, the current legislation and agenda that groups cannabis with hard drugs (under the general category "drugs") supports one sort of a gateway theory. Not only does it bunch cannabis and its effects with more dangerous drugs, making cannabis seem more dangerous in the eyes of the public and hard drugs less so, it also essentially forces every cannabis user to deal with the people who also distribute/use hard drugs.

I don't think the change of legal status necessarily means that it will be accepted in society... is alcohol accepted? is tobacco? I think the important thing is to get rid of the term drugs and start talking about the specific effects and problems that the use of each substance causes. Discussing cannabis use in the general category of drugs diminishes the actual dangers and problems of so-called hard drugs.

How can you argue on supply... keep in mind that weed is essentially a weed, it's extremely easy to grow and yields a big harvest with each plant. If it were legalized we'd most likely see a great increase in homegrowing and outdoors growing and the market value would drop anywhere in the world. The illegal import business from mexico/morocco/whatever would decrease and eventually disappear (or move on to other drugs), just like there's no big business in smuggling carrots or potatos (both harder to grow) over international borders.

As a fellow cannabis grower I don't mind the legal status right now, I grow enough for myself and closest friends and make some money out of it :happy:

For ideological reasons I'd say legal, but for reasons related to my cashflow I'll say illegal :cool:

Aw missed... gj lads, gf mm.

Hmm... when S0 disbanded it was the #1 pure clan, having just beat FOE in a full out and having a great amount of good members. I guess I wanted to be a part of that again.

How do you outpull in a 200 vs 200 matched opts fight lol? Fatality, Tactics? O_O

 

@ded TLP, unless DP outpulls them

 

TLP vs CPR P2P Matched Opts [ real thing is happening tomorrow ]

Oh you ment 200 opts... I was about to point out that neither clan would pull 200. I automatically assume that someone is talking about the amount of people if they use the format "clan pulls [number]". 200 opts... an odd number to choose since it can't be divided by 3.

~66.6 for each side... would be a tough fight, but as someone stated, EOP is much harder in 50v50 than 75v75, and it's in between. I'll still give my biased vote for FI.

TLP hardly losing anyone

 

 

EOP vs FI F2P 200 vs 200 Bounty Hunter GDZ - Returning OFF

Fatality would outpull and take the win, unless tactics miserably failed.

CPR vs DP P2P full out CLW classic, 20 def cap

I'd quit but as someone said, for the sake of the topic... I'd consider between TLP and CP, CP because I still know some people there from ages ago, TLP because they're respectable and have a good community.

Always loved F2P... the way its all about organization and leadership, not equipment and the amount of barragers. The fights too are more intense when it doesn't instantly turn into a territorial blitz/cbow match.

Which takes more skill? Personally I think F2P, you have to be a lot more cautious when you dont have inv full of necks and brews, when you get piled you need to be able to think and move instantly.

P2P does offer more variety though, which is why most clans choose to P2P pk too.

GJ both clans, I expected this result. Beastly in full outs, just beastly.

Have no fear CP ima come anticrash with my massers.

See I said FI was the easiest clan to troll, you gotta stop taking the internet so seriously kid, life evolves around much more than runescape, PW forums, and the internet. I just get amused how ****** off you guys get over it. We AC'ed lots of fights last weekend, and came across many fights which we did not crash, incase you don't realize it, the only clan we ever really crash is FI because of all the smack you guys talk week in and week out. Nobody to blame but yourselves.

 

01.) FI talks smack

02.) EOP kills and/or makes FI run and hide.

03.) EOP inserts troll here.

04.) FI gets mad and flames.

05.) EOP ruins FI's trip.

 

It is a constant cycle, the easiest way to stop this cycle is to start at #1, which in this case, stop talking smack.

Notice the main difference between FI and EOP, it's not FI ranks talking **** on PW. Grow up russell.

**** talking ranks top 3

1. EOP

-gap-

2. FOE (walli lol)

3. DP

So your calling the leadership of fatality james, and badar ****? Where you even around those days? Did you even have an account? Fi swept mm + foe for two years strait. You make it sound like foe is very special..

We're talking last august, James wasn't around anymore. Badar is 14 he was never a good leader.

EDIT: If you want to know more details about that period of time in FI history, you can read all about it at http://rs-fi.com/index.php?showtopic=7425 . I wrote it myself so it should be flawless :cool:

Going to say MM, they have a better full out history and for some obscure reason they always seem to win F2P full outs.

Belongs in miniwars. Gj anyway.