Jump to content

Welcome to Pure Warfare - The #1 Community for Pures

Welcome to Pure Warfare - The #1 Community for Pures, like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be apart of Pure Warfare - The #1 Community for Pures by signing in or creating an account.
  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get email updates
  • Get your own profile page and make new friends
  • Send personal messages to other members.

brotato

Member
  • Posts

    526
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by brotato

  1. EOP have never won a fullout, and have lost twice to Fatality.

     

    Fatality was top for the entirety of 2007, and has been amongst the top 3 more regularly than EOP.

     

    Overall F2P

     

    1. MM

    2. FOE

    3. FI

    4. Epidemic

    5. EOP

     

    Overall P2P

     

    1. FOE

    2. Fi

    3. MM

    4. TLP

     

    Nice list, however both your statements are incorrect.

     

    Nice reply, however your statement has no valid explanation just a meaningless point with nothing to back it up.

     

    EoP have won multiple fullouts (as pointed out numerous times but clearly you Fi lads are just ignoring it as you're so starved of action you have nothing better to do than attempt to troll on PW with incorrect facts).

     

    Also, the 2012 fullout between EoP and Fi is pretty much known as complete nonsense, considering EoP had a +12 lead in round 3 until their teamspeak was ddosed (and Fi's ts was never ddosed at any stage), so it's hardly a barometer of how good each clan is.

     

    Fi weren't top for the entirety of 2007, EoP was top for a large portion of it.

     

    Fi weren't a top 3 clan for 4 years while you pulled 10 to mandatory events and had to have inners in clan wars instead of trips, while we were actually fighting mm/foe/e for #1, slumping dp and cp, and you know...having trips.

     

    Show me evidence of you winning a fullout war against a recognised clan (2v2s dont count) and i'll admit im wrong on that count. We were also DDoS'd for all three rounds, the fact you'll try and use that as an excuse is pretty laughable and a sign of your bias. Fi were top for the majority of 2007. You talk a lot of our downfalls, but you forget to mention that when it matters EOP has always been 2nd best to Fatality, when it's come down to it, 2-0 is all she wrote.

     

    wasn't hard to grab this off yt

     

  2. EOP have never won a fullout, and have lost twice to Fatality.

     

    Fatality was top for the entirety of 2007, and has been amongst the top 3 more regularly than EOP.

     

    Overall F2P

     

    1. MM

    2. FOE

    3. FI

    4. Epidemic

    5. EOP

     

    Overall P2P

     

    1. FOE

    2. Fi

    3. MM

    4. TLP

     

    Nice list, however both your statements are incorrect.

     

    Nice reply, however your statement has no valid explanation just a meaningless point with nothing to back it up.

     

    EoP have won multiple fullouts (as pointed out numerous times but clearly you Fi lads are just ignoring it as you're so starved of action you have nothing better to do than attempt to troll on PW with incorrect facts).

     

    Also, the 2012 fullout between EoP and Fi is pretty much known as complete nonsense, considering EoP had a +12 lead in round 3 until their teamspeak was ddosed (and Fi's ts was never ddosed at any stage), so it's hardly a barometer of how good each clan is.

     

    Fi weren't top for the entirety of 2007, EoP was top for a large portion of it.

     

    Fi weren't a top 3 clan for 4 years while you pulled 10 to mandatory events and had to have inners in clan wars instead of trips, while we were actually fighting mm/foe/e for #1, slumping dp and cp, and you know...having trips.

  3. I think it's the first time in the history of pure clans that one clan is so superior to others that other clans will not war them even for practice.

     

     

    In before excuses.

     

    no, in fact Fi refused to prep EoP for nearly 2 years because of how humiliated they got when we beat then in a F2P prep on the friday of their birthday weekend in 2010

    rly?

     

    ye, u might have missed it because you'd clan hopped to mm after bein tired of bein in da slumps

    We didn't fight you for 10 months in a prep because of the DDoS'ing that would occur on both sides after each prep and the amount of flame and stupidity the one hour event brought wasn't worth the victory for either side.

     

    No this was well before the whole ddosing debacle, i believe the reason given was that we flamed you after the prep, and you didn't want to prep flamers

     

    Which was hilarious because we did no worse than you or any other clan would do to a rival after they beat them in a prep.

     

    It was fairly obvious to everyone it was an excuse for the fact we were on another whole level to you.

  4. EOP have never won a fullout, and have lost twice to Fatality.

     

    Fatality was top for the entirety of 2007, and has been amongst the top 3 more regularly than EOP.

     

    Overall F2P

     

    1. MM

    2. FOE

    3. FI

    4. Epidemic

    5. EOP

     

    Overall P2P

     

    1. FOE

    2. Fi

    3. MM

    4. TLP

     

    Nice list, however both your statements are incorrect.

  5. I think it's the first time in the history of pure clans that one clan is so superior to others that other clans will not war them even for practice.

     

     

    In before excuses.

     

    no, in fact Fi refused to prep EoP for nearly 2 years because of how humiliated they got when we beat then in a F2P prep on the friday of their birthday weekend in 2010

    rly?

     

    ye, u might have missed it because you'd clan hopped to mm after bein tired of bein in da slumps

  6. Just to clarify, the lists are of all time meaning where the clans have stood since the opening days of that clan. And there rank in the pure world during there era.

     

    F2P All time

    MM - MM has always been up there, and nobody will match what they have accomplished in F2P due to there consistency, pre pvp days as well as now they've always been pretty consistent.

     

    Fi - Pre pvp days, Fi was unstoppable. Watching the Fi video's from back in the day is what got me to make a pure in the first place. I know Fi has slumped 2009-2011 but you can never take away what they have accomplished and the holding of #1 for 2 years straight. In the pre pvp days Fi was known to be dominant force in F2P as well as ending the pure era on a high note now.

     

    FOE - The reason why I am not putting Foe above Fi, is that I think Fi has just edged them due to the fact that what Fi accomplished during there peak was far greater than Foe in F2P. However i'm quite unsure about this one since Fi has slumped for 3 years whilst FOE stayed consistent juggling #1 with MM during the slump days of Fatality.

     

    EOP - Eop had there time when they we're on top in the wilderness, but were never as dominant as the clans above at there prime, this is my opinion. Some may say its bias but i'm entitled to it. EOP in my opinion should be considered rank #4 due to there F2P Full out record to back this as well as Fi beating EoP in all full outs against each other.

     

    Epidemic - E deserves rank 5 in my opinion, they rose up so fast at there era where clans were getting demolished the gap between #1 and #2 was HUGE at E's era and nobody can argue against that. In F2P of course.

     

     

    P2P All time

    FOE - Nobody has been able to match FOE in P2P. Amazing consistency, there were times when other clans would come close to competing with them however in the end it was always FOE who came out on top. They held #1 for the longest in P2P.

     

    Fi - People are forgetting the old days, when Fi were so dominant other clans could simply not compete it seems like this 3 year slump has put these days in the shadows. Facts are facts, Fi were so strong and the state Fi are in now ending on a high note puts them in #2. FOE being #1 by a margin as they were the most consistent. Whereas Fi had a boom where they were at a all time high buss during the slump and boom ending the pure era as #1 again.

     

    MM/TLP - MM were always strong in P2P due to numbers, however were never really a dominant force in P2P however consistently being #2 behind FOE buts them in #3 overall. As for TLP they had there times on top but never held it for long enough to achieve anything above #3.

     

    My opinion, please don't get all butthurt ^^

     

    Like i said in the OP people are entitled to rank whoever they want wherever, but by going on at the start, and throughout, about how your rankings were to take into account all era's (as if implying others didn't), then giving in depth descriptions of who did what years ago when you've clanned for barely a year, is a bit silly.

     

    Numerous examples of historical inaccuracy stemming from you not knowing about what you're talking about, such as saying when E was #1 the gap was massive, when in reality they and MM were very evenly matched, and it only took a month for them to get back ahead of E.

     

    Or saying Fi were strong in p2p many years ago when the reality was they were rubbish quality wise and got beaten in a fullout with a +20.

     

    Also "pre-pvp" days Fi were not unstoppable, numerous clans, especially EoP, frequently knocked around Fi and were considered better for long periods of time.

     

     

    but u were closed the majority of pcl

    ?

     

    who am i?

    either jonty or some mad eop kid

    ?

     

    why would you think i'm mad lol

     

    and if you're referring to eop, no they weren't.

  7. I think it's the first time in the history of pure clans that one clan is so superior to others that other clans will not war them even for practice.

     

     

    In before excuses.

     

    no, in fact Fi refused to prep EoP for nearly 2 years because of how humiliated they got when we beat then in a F2P prep on the friday of their birthday weekend in 2010

  8. Just to clarify, the lists are of all time meaning where the clans have stood since the opening days of that clan. And there rank in the pure world during there era.

     

    F2P All time

    MM - MM has always been up there, and nobody will match what they have accomplished in F2P due to there consistency, pre pvp days as well as now they've always been pretty consistent.

     

    Fi - Pre pvp days, Fi was unstoppable. Watching the Fi video's from back in the day is what got me to make a pure in the first place. I know Fi has slumped 2009-2011 but you can never take away what they have accomplished and the holding of #1 for 2 years straight. In the pre pvp days Fi was known to be dominant force in F2P as well as ending the pure era on a high note now.

     

    FOE - The reason why I am not putting Foe above Fi, is that I think Fi has just edged them due to the fact that what Fi accomplished during there peak was far greater than Foe in F2P. However i'm quite unsure about this one since Fi has slumped for 3 years whilst FOE stayed consistent juggling #1 with MM during the slump days of Fatality.

     

    EOP - Eop had there time when they we're on top in the wilderness, but were never as dominant as the clans above at there prime, this is my opinion. Some may say its bias but i'm entitled to it. EOP in my opinion should be considered rank #4 due to there F2P Full out record to back this as well as Fi beating EoP in all full outs against each other.

     

    Epidemic - E deserves rank 5 in my opinion, they rose up so fast at there era where clans were getting demolished the gap between #1 and #2 was HUGE at E's era and nobody can argue against that. In F2P of course.

     

     

    P2P All time

    FOE - Nobody has been able to match FOE in P2P. Amazing consistency, there were times when other clans would come close to competing with them however in the end it was always FOE who came out on top. They held #1 for the longest in P2P.

     

    Fi - People are forgetting the old days, when Fi were so dominant other clans could simply not compete it seems like this 3 year slump has put these days in the shadows. Facts are facts, Fi were so strong and the state Fi are in now ending on a high note puts them in #2. FOE being #1 by a margin as they were the most consistent. Whereas Fi had a boom where they were at a all time high buss during the slump and boom ending the pure era as #1 again.

     

    MM/TLP - MM were always strong in P2P due to numbers, however were never really a dominant force in P2P however consistently being #2 behind FOE buts them in #3 overall. As for TLP they had there times on top but never held it for long enough to achieve anything above #3.

     

    My opinion, please don't get all butthurt ^^

     

    Like i said in the OP people are entitled to rank whoever they want wherever, but by going on at the start, and throughout, about how your rankings were to take into account all era's (as if implying others didn't), then giving in depth descriptions of who did what years ago when you've clanned for barely a year, is a bit silly.

     

    Numerous examples of historical inaccuracy stemming from you not knowing about what you're talking about, such as saying when E was #1 the gap was massive, when in reality they and MM were very evenly matched, and it only took a month for them to get back ahead of E.

     

    Or saying Fi were strong in p2p many years ago when the reality was they were rubbish quality wise and got beaten in a fullout with a +20.

     

    Also "pre-pvp" days Fi were not unstoppable, numerous clans, especially EoP, frequently knocked around Fi and were considered better for long periods of time.

     

     

    but u were closed the majority of pcl

    ?

     

    who am i?

  9. Just to clarify, the lists are of all time meaning where the clans have stood since the opening days of that clan. And there rank in the pure world during there era.

     

    F2P All time

    MM - MM has always been up there, and nobody will match what they have accomplished in F2P due to there consistency, pre pvp days as well as now they've always been pretty consistent.

     

    Fi - Pre pvp days, Fi was unstoppable. Watching the Fi video's from back in the day is what got me to make a pure in the first place. I know Fi has slumped 2009-2011 but you can never take away what they have accomplished and the holding of #1 for 2 years straight. In the pre pvp days Fi was known to be dominant force in F2P as well as ending the pure era on a high note now.

     

    FOE - The reason why I am not putting Foe above Fi, is that I think Fi has just edged them due to the fact that what Fi accomplished during there peak was far greater than Foe in F2P. However i'm quite unsure about this one since Fi has slumped for 3 years whilst FOE stayed consistent juggling #1 with MM during the slump days of Fatality.

     

    EOP - Eop had there time when they we're on top in the wilderness, but were never as dominant as the clans above at there prime, this is my opinion. Some may say its bias but i'm entitled to it. EOP in my opinion should be considered rank #4 due to there F2P Full out record to back this as well as Fi beating EoP in all full outs against each other.

     

    Epidemic - E deserves rank 5 in my opinion, they rose up so fast at there era where clans were getting demolished the gap between #1 and #2 was HUGE at E's era and nobody can argue against that. In F2P of course.

     

     

    P2P All time

    FOE - Nobody has been able to match FOE in P2P. Amazing consistency, there were times when other clans would come close to competing with them however in the end it was always FOE who came out on top. They held #1 for the longest in P2P.

     

    Fi - People are forgetting the old days, when Fi were so dominant other clans could simply not compete it seems like this 3 year slump has put these days in the shadows. Facts are facts, Fi were so strong and the state Fi are in now ending on a high note puts them in #2. FOE being #1 by a margin as they were the most consistent. Whereas Fi had a boom where they were at a all time high buss during the slump and boom ending the pure era as #1 again.

     

    MM/TLP - MM were always strong in P2P due to numbers, however were never really a dominant force in P2P however consistently being #2 behind FOE buts them in #3 overall. As for TLP they had there times on top but never held it for long enough to achieve anything above #3.

     

    My opinion, please don't get all butthurt ^^

     

    Like i said in the OP people are entitled to rank whoever they want wherever, but by going on at the start, and throughout, about how your rankings were to take into account all era's (as if implying others didn't), then giving in depth descriptions of who did what years ago when you've clanned for barely a year, is a bit silly.

     

    Numerous examples of historical inaccuracy stemming from you not knowing about what you're talking about, such as saying when E was #1 the gap was massive, when in reality they and MM were very evenly matched, and it only took a month for them to get back ahead of E.

     

    Or saying Fi were strong in p2p many years ago when the reality was they were rubbish quality wise and got beaten in a fullout with a +20.

     

    Also "pre-pvp" days Fi were not unstoppable, numerous clans, especially EoP, frequently knocked around Fi and were considered better for long periods of time.

     

    Rank however you want but don't give the illusion that yours is more factually correct than other peoples.

  10. The combat system has been on the whole unchanged for the entirety of pure clanning, but seeing as in the new combat system everyone's prior achievements will become largely irrelevant, it seems fitting we have a topic on the best of the best in this clanning system. Sort of like an "ending" list topic for the past 8 or so years of pure clanning in this combat system.

     

    How is this different to the top clan list topic? Because read the paragraph I just bothered to type out.

     

    Obviously everyones opinion is subjective, and there are no definitive correct rankings or answeres, so lets try to not get our sacks in a twist if you don't agree. Feel free to give reasons for the ranks given, if it floats your boat.

     

    F2P All Time

    1.

    2.

    3.

    4.

    5.

     

    P2P All Time

    1.

    2.

    3.

    4.

    5.

     

    My list:

     

    F2P All Time

    1. MM - Pretty undisputed as the most consistent f2p pure clan, held #1 longer than anyone else was able to.

    2. EoP - #1 for much of 2007, and for large periods of 2010/2011 when battling with MM, who eventually slumped us at the start of 2012.

    3. FOE - Has never been good at holding onto #1 f2p for long periods, but has been very consistent in being in the top 1-3 for many years.

    4. Fi - Was ok a few years ago until EoP took #1 f2p off them in 2007, then was ok for a while again until all their ranks left and were subsequently slumped by EoP for 3 years, but is having a strong 2012.

    5. CP - Only other clan thats been doing for f2p for a long time, was #1 for a while in BH, as well as for a month or so in the Chain69 era until EoP slumped them.

     

    P2P All Time

    1. FOE - #1 p2p for years at a time, even when getting teamed by MM + HF for months at a time.

    2. MM - Most consistent rivals for FOE, and for years were really the only clan that could put up a fight

    3. TLP - Not consistent with pulls but always have had good quality, have challenged for and taken #1 when they build up enough momentum.

    4. Fi - Been ok with p2p at stages, although getting beaten 100v80 by FOE was probably the most embarassing moment of any clan in the history of pure clans

    5. IR - Were always Intense and provided the lulz, while also being good at p2p

  11. how about u guys mini Fi instead mining easy clan?

     

    I would have hoped that in 4 years of you attempting to troll in broken English, your language skills would have improved somewhat.

     

    Indeed I am left disappointed but not overly surprised.

×
  • Create New...