Nippon

EoP is willing to change.

 

Stopped reading there.

This. False flag alert.

Interesting.

/query Nip for AC in F2P

I wish these admins would butt in and say **** it 1 month left, lets just ban EOP. Less drama for everyone and they were irrelevant anyways.

I'll have to go with FI on this, they've had a lot of practice with f2p full outs lately.

A special congratulations to CP for slapping Fi today in your f2p fullout war, its a shame we weren't afforded the same feeling of victory with our TS ddosed in round 3 while we were winning, but you have proven to the pure community just how terrible they really are.

...because DDoSing all the ranks of the other clan and still losing 3-0 (87-0 lol) is you winning a fight

Gratz on your first decent trip in 6 months, the joy won't last long.

Gratz CP, well deserved

Oh, you were expecting a clean fight?

Gratz none the less FOE

Look, Foe members/ranks who are using 2 people to excuse a 3-0. You aren't going to accidentally defeat us. Spend every day practicing like we do, cut the excuses, and then you'll have your chance.

^

Gratz FI

FI vs MM for F2P, FI will be the underdogs looking at previous full outs between the 2

FI vs FOE for P2P, FI are again the underdogs looking at previous P2P full outs between the 2

Np for keeping LS busy in F2P.

How many preps is that?

Gratz FI

Sucks about the mains sniping but thats almost expected aswell, Supreme 0wnage lmao....nippons ol' team of mains is giving fi's old clan name (S0) a bad name with these mains...you'd think they'd have thought of a better name then one that was already used long ago hehe.

Get your facts straight.

1. I haven't scaped for a month.

2. S0 (the team) was founded 4 years ago independently by some ex-S0 members, I only heard about it afterwards

3. S0 has nothing whatsoever to do with FI, as I'm the only person from FI to pk with S0. For the sake of comparison, there have been more EOP, CP and MM members in S0 than FI members.

4. You're one to talk with the obvious proof of purposefully teaming with another main team (LS) for several months.

5. What clan are you gonna close into? I don't think anyone wants your rank team after what we've seen from you this year.

You should stop thinking.

LMFAO jesus you srs why flame l0l u suck

You realize strongdog71 wasn't a rsb clan right? It was basically people in the MM community (mostly current members) on their mains. That being said, we probably would gotten raped by vr/rsd/df or whatever had we progressed far enough but we got dqed for adding members within the last 24 hours.

That I didn't know, I just assumed so because I think I've fought someone by that name in CLW.

Pretty much just outlined why 2010 was a great year for EoP, as for Epidemic all they did in 2010 was mass recruit for a month, then suck our ***** into teaming with them against MM, then close when that didn't work and they realised the slump was coming.

I can see why EOP would think that 2k10 was a good year, but only because EOP was never competing at the top before that (except for a period of time at the summer of 2007), so they have no point of comparison. Same goes for clans like Epidemic which didn't even exist when clan PKing was good. Still, even for EOP 2005-2007 were the best years of clan PKing (I know, I was there before EOP closed into FI).

There is a vast difference between how clans fought each other in 2k10 and 2007, those of us who were there know how and why.

Describe for me any phenomenon in our society that is beyond your understanding, and I will explain it to you without the need to introduce Illuminati, aliens or Jesus to the picture. A single one.

Everything in our society is a result of people acting according to their self-interest in a given environment. If there is an Illuminati, they have seemingly done nothing but sat in a dark chamber for the past 500 years, so I'd describe them as relatively harmelss.

Ill be honest tho is Fi wins they got a clear shot at winnin seein the 2 Top main clans got eliminated (if Fi wins then Rsd gets eliminated) and the best main clan Strongdog71 got Dq for havin 2 in gravite wen other clan chose default rules at last second. Strongdog pulled a minimum of 57 for their earlier rounds lol they got like a 300 ml or somethin like that lol

>best main clan

>Strongdog71

LMAO. That's like saying that some random masser team from W57 is the best pure clan.

Strongdog or any other RSB clan wouldn't stand a chance against any of the clans in the QF, with the possible exception of NME/FI.

Again, best of luck to FI and NME, you'll need some superb tactics for this.

L2have a vidder with pub on... I wanna see the spams.

Gj though.

Holy, I remember that fight.

E on nip

You have a chance to win if you outnumber them 2 to 1. That being said, RSD won't pull under 50 to this.

Don't you guys reckon it'd be more fun to have those kind of fights for these last possible months of pure clanning? Instead of hanging around in Single just running? :/

You do realize that the whole vid you posted consists of clans hitting each other in clusterfucks then running to single?

2k10 was lame as shet. Here, take a seat and let me tell you of a time when clans fought each other in wilderness to the last clan standing.

Are you serious? Someone is a suspect until they are convicted in a court of law. There is nothing ambigious about this.

The guy was a top student that graduated with honors and had never committed a crime. Considering these external factors, it is entirely plausible to speculate that he might have had a mental disorder or severe depression. This might or might not be true, but before you call it biased I'd like to hear your better explanation for his behavior.

Surely if someone is a junkie it is relevant to the case, as would being an illegal immigrant or having terrorist connections, but I see no reason to blatantly lie that this person was any of those things and, fortunately for those of us who value truth over propaganda, neither does the media.

Can you add a section for Obama spending and how much his healthcare bill will cost?

I take it that this is directed to me.

It is hard to say, but the most recent estimate from CBO is that the 2010 healthcare reform will cost a net total of $1,042 billion over the 2012–2021 period. [1]

However:

The other provisions affecting direct spending were estimated to reduce net federal

outlays (primarily for Medicare) by $732 billion over the 2012–2021 period.

 

The provisions affecting federal revenues (apart from those related to insurance

coverage) were estimated to increase revenues by $520 billion over the 2012–2021

period.

 

Altogether, those provisions of PPACA and the Reconciliation Act were estimated to

increase direct spending by $604 billion and to increase revenues by $813 billion over

the 2012–2021 period.

That is to say that for the 2012-2021 period the healthcare reform will reduce decifit by an estimated $119 billion.

What about other spending? ARRA and 2010 Tax Act combine to a net cost of about $900 billion.

Now, for the sake of comparison, let's look at CBO estimates for some major costs in the fiscal period 2001-2011

n June 2012, CBO summarized the cause of change between its January 2001 estimate of a $5.6 trillion cumulative surplus between 2002 and 2011 and the actual $6.1 trillion cumulative deficit that occurred, an unfavorable "turnaround" or debt increase of $11.7 trillion. Tax cuts and slower-than-expected growth reduced revenues by $6.1 trillion and spending was $5.6 trillion higher. Of this total, the CBO attributes 72% to legislated tax cuts and spending increases and 27% to economic and technical factors. Of the latter, 56% occurred from 2009 to 2011.[63][64]

 

The difference between the projected and actual debt in 2011 can be largely attributed to:

 

$3.5 trillion – Economic changes (including lower than expected tax revenues and higher safety net spending due to recession)

$1.6 trillion – Bush Tax Cuts (EGTRRA and JGTRRA), primarily tax cuts but also some smaller spending increases

$1.5 trillion - Increased non-defense discretionary spending

$1.4 trillion – Wars in Afghanistan and Iraq

$1.4 trillion - Incremental interest due to higher debt balances

$0.9 trillion - Obama stimulus and tax cuts (ARRA and Tax Act of 2010)

Of course the reckless spending havoc that president Bush went on during his two periods in power is perhaps not a fair comparison, but to say that simply having a republican in power would magically decrease the decifit is just nonsense when you look at the historical context.

Or better yet add a section for success Obama has had. It will consist of nothing positive or helpful. He won the race vote, simple as that dude is terrible.

I don't want to debate that. I find many faults in the actions of president Obama during his 3 and a half years as a president. However, loose fiscal policy certainly isn't one, not when compared to any republican president since and including Reagan.

[1] http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbo...legislation.pdf

ps. the picture you posted is an estimate from 2009

pps. the link you posted contains so many errors I don't know where to begin...

first of all, nominal debt alone tells nothing, you have to look at the increases and decreases in spending and revenues

secondly, while Obama started in office in January of 2009, most of the increase in spending in 2009 was due to laws passed by the Bush administration. Take a look at the link I posted earlier.

ppps. soz PBK0 I failed to detect the irony

You do realize that the raise in budget decifit can for the most part be attributed to your last republican president?

Good read:

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/st...a-has-lowest-s/