Kaleb

Third round description is incorrect but you still won. The fights were fun. (The fight was never by the jail.)

This.

Not if you crash :confused:

Nah.

Epidemic have a lot of F2P members and possibly some that don't pk much. (I haven't pked in 2 weeks. Got tired of it.)

HF saved you from embarrassment :confused: You should thank them.

You got a pure clan award on Runescape Community? Congratulations! They are the experts on these types of awards. :banana:

Fun trip :biggrin:

I dislike P2P. Even when we won it was quite dull.

Sounds almost correct. You left out the part where you ran in and froze/spec every E member you found. (I saw Beastdefire, J U B Jub, and Reached Zero all attack me before I had the chance to even use a barrage.) Foe just came in specing for the pixels; don't play off the actions as innocent. The crash may have been accidental, but that story is horribly inaccurate. Oh and does this look like TLP and E teaming? TLP never even attempted to kill Foe. Oh well. Hope to see you next weekend.

No, we were supposed to team. From what I saw, the majority of TLP just attacked anyone close to them.

P2P: Foe (Crashed) MM/E TLP (Were fighting E and losing when Foe crashed, so E got off them and they continued to pile E) C Didn't see any other clans.

That fight we actually only piled 1-2 Foe members :blush:

Tanks, appreciated input is your greatly.

Tanks, your input is highly appreciated.

Tanks, your input is appreciated.

Was a fun trip. Died twice before we ever really started but ended with 3-4 kills.

Same way they beat you today? :blush:

Since I've seen some F2P + P2P Matched I'll make my own category too! F2P - P2P Non-matched. E EOP Cp Fi MM Dv Foe TLP

When you fight main/rune pure/tank clans you normally double or triple their opts :banana: You nearly double Px's opts last week or whenever it was. (Try to make less retarded comments next time.)

Lol @ Speshls. Was a fun war (survived every round).

There's the Walli I was searching for :banana:

23 more days of 578 swamp lizards to go!

Did you even read his post? Because yours does not synch with his at all. His "definition of pures" has nothing do to with the "pure community's" definition of pure; therefore, the majority of his post was completely off topic and, as I remember it, rather contradicting. (I haven't read it in a day or two and have no desire to read it again, so if I'm incorrect, sorry.)

Who're you talking about? I'm neither 20 nor 30 defense.