brotato

Nice list, however both your statements are incorrect. Nice reply, however your statement has no valid explanation just a meaningless point with nothing to back it up. EoP have won multiple fullouts (as pointed out numerous times but clearly you Fi lads are just ignoring it as you're so starved of action you have nothing better to do than attempt to troll on PW with incorrect facts). Also, the 2012 fullout between EoP and Fi is pretty much known as complete nonsense, considering EoP had a +12 lead in round 3 until their teamspeak was ddosed (and Fi's ts was never ddosed at any stage), so it's hardly a barometer of how good each clan is. Fi weren't top for the entirety of 2007, EoP was top for a large portion of it. Fi weren't a top 3 clan for 4 years while you pulled 10 to mandatory events and had to have inners in clan wars instead of trips, while we were actually fighting mm/foe/e for #1, slumping dp and cp, and you know...having trips. Show me evidence of you winning a fullout war against a recognised clan (2v2s dont count) and i'll admit im wrong on that count. We were also DDoS'd for all three rounds, the fact you'll try and use that as an excuse is pretty laughable and a sign of your bias. Fi were top for the majority of 2007. You talk a lot of our downfalls, but you forget to mention that when it matters EOP has always been 2nd best to Fatality, when it's come down to it, 2-0 is all she wrote. wasn't hard to grab this off yt

mad ownaje

Nice list, however both your statements are incorrect. Nice reply, however your statement has no valid explanation just a meaningless point with nothing to back it up. EoP have won multiple fullouts (as pointed out numerous times but clearly you Fi lads are just ignoring it as you're so starved of action you have nothing better to do than attempt to troll on PW with incorrect facts). Also, the 2012 fullout between EoP and Fi is pretty much known as complete nonsense, considering EoP had a +12 lead in round 3 until their teamspeak was ddosed (and Fi's ts was never ddosed at any stage), so it's hardly a barometer of how good each clan is. Fi weren't top for the entirety of 2007, EoP was top for a large portion of it. Fi weren't a top 3 clan for 4 years while you pulled 10 to mandatory events and had to have inners in clan wars instead of trips, while we were actually fighting mm/foe/e for #1, slumping dp and cp, and you know...having trips.

no, in fact Fi refused to prep EoP for nearly 2 years because of how humiliated they got when we beat then in a F2P prep on the friday of their birthday weekend in 2010 rly? ye, u might have missed it because you'd clan hopped to mm after bein tired of bein in da slumps We didn't fight you for 10 months in a prep because of the DDoS'ing that would occur on both sides after each prep and the amount of flame and stupidity the one hour event brought wasn't worth the victory for either side. No this was well before the whole ddosing debacle, i believe the reason given was that we flamed you after the prep, and you didn't want to prep flamers Which was hilarious because we did no worse than you or any other clan would do to a rival after they beat them in a prep. It was fairly obvious to everyone it was an excuse for the fact we were on another whole level to you.

Nice list, however both your statements are incorrect.

no, in fact Fi refused to prep EoP for nearly 2 years because of how humiliated they got when we beat then in a F2P prep on the friday of their birthday weekend in 2010 rly? ye, u might have missed it because you'd clan hopped to mm after bein tired of bein in da slumps

Like i said in the OP people are entitled to rank whoever they want wherever, but by going on at the start, and throughout, about how your rankings were to take into account all era's (as if implying others didn't), then giving in depth descriptions of who did what years ago when you've clanned for barely a year, is a bit silly. Numerous examples of historical inaccuracy stemming from you not knowing about what you're talking about, such as saying when E was #1 the gap was massive, when in reality they and MM were very evenly matched, and it only took a month for them to get back ahead of E. Or saying Fi were strong in p2p many years ago when the reality was they were rubbish quality wise and got beaten in a fullout with a +20. Also "pre-pvp" days Fi were not unstoppable, numerous clans, especially EoP, frequently knocked around Fi and were considered better for long periods of time. but u were closed the majority of pcl ? who am i? either jonty or some mad eop kid ? why would you think i'm mad lol and if you're referring to eop, no they weren't.

no, in fact Fi refused to prep EoP for nearly 2 years because of how humiliated they got when we beat then in a F2P prep on the friday of their birthday weekend in 2010

Like i said in the OP people are entitled to rank whoever they want wherever, but by going on at the start, and throughout, about how your rankings were to take into account all era's (as if implying others didn't), then giving in depth descriptions of who did what years ago when you've clanned for barely a year, is a bit silly. Numerous examples of historical inaccuracy stemming from you not knowing about what you're talking about, such as saying when E was #1 the gap was massive, when in reality they and MM were very evenly matched, and it only took a month for them to get back ahead of E. Or saying Fi were strong in p2p many years ago when the reality was they were rubbish quality wise and got beaten in a fullout with a +20. Also "pre-pvp" days Fi were not unstoppable, numerous clans, especially EoP, frequently knocked around Fi and were considered better for long periods of time. but u were closed the majority of pcl ? who am i?

Like i said in the OP people are entitled to rank whoever they want wherever, but by going on at the start, and throughout, about how your rankings were to take into account all era's (as if implying others didn't), then giving in depth descriptions of who did what years ago when you've clanned for barely a year, is a bit silly. Numerous examples of historical inaccuracy stemming from you not knowing about what you're talking about, such as saying when E was #1 the gap was massive, when in reality they and MM were very evenly matched, and it only took a month for them to get back ahead of E. Or saying Fi were strong in p2p many years ago when the reality was they were rubbish quality wise and got beaten in a fullout with a +20. Also "pre-pvp" days Fi were not unstoppable, numerous clans, especially EoP, frequently knocked around Fi and were considered better for long periods of time. Rank however you want but don't give the illusion that yours is more factually correct than other peoples.

would have been far more interesting if you were right

some good lists here guys great job

O no man what are you gonna do?? Hop after us and try to kill a straggler? Everyone's shivering in their climbing boots bro! lmfao even sefket goin in for the fi kill

goodluck, this is a feat i acheieved approximately 70 times while dodging mods.

The combat system has been on the whole unchanged for the entirety of pure clanning, but seeing as in the new combat system everyone's prior achievements will become largely irrelevant, it seems fitting we have a topic on the best of the best in this clanning system. Sort of like an "ending" list topic for the past 8 or so years of pure clanning in this combat system. How is this different to the top clan list topic? Because read the paragraph I just bothered to type out. Obviously everyones opinion is subjective, and there are no definitive correct rankings or answeres, so lets try to not get our sacks in a twist if you don't agree. Feel free to give reasons for the ranks given, if it floats your boat. F2P All Time 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. P2P All Time 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. My list: F2P All Time 1. MM - Pretty undisputed as the most consistent f2p pure clan, held #1 longer than anyone else was able to. 2. EoP - #1 for much of 2007, and for large periods of 2010/2011 when battling with MM, who eventually slumped us at the start of 2012. 3. FOE - Has never been good at holding onto #1 f2p for long periods, but has been very consistent in being in the top 1-3 for many years. 4. Fi - Was ok a few years ago until EoP took #1 f2p off them in 2007, then was ok for a while again until all their ranks left and were subsequently slumped by EoP for 3 years, but is having a strong 2012. 5. CP - Only other clan thats been doing for f2p for a long time, was #1 for a while in BH, as well as for a month or so in the Chain69 era until EoP slumped them. P2P All Time 1. FOE - #1 p2p for years at a time, even when getting teamed by MM + HF for months at a time. 2. MM - Most consistent rivals for FOE, and for years were really the only clan that could put up a fight 3. TLP - Not consistent with pulls but always have had good quality, have challenged for and taken #1 when they build up enough momentum. 4. Fi - Been ok with p2p at stages, although getting beaten 100v80 by FOE was probably the most embarassing moment of any clan in the history of pure clans 5. IR - Were always Intense and provided the lulz, while also being good at p2p

looks like they didn't even care that they were in a "fight" with you and continued to fight actual competition until you got bored of doing no damage and left looks like you're starved if this is what you've resorted to on trips :P

poor fi :P

my advice about your advice? shut up no-one cares

but then how could every1 blame eop for ddos

you know how we can all tell you don't play football? because you called it soccer you ****

shut the **** up kid don't use my topic for postcount

yo propa real talk what is the password to my real account, bein a potato is holdin me back

I would have hoped that in 4 years of you attempting to troll in broken English, your language skills would have improved somewhat. Indeed I am left disappointed but not overly surprised.

did you form this opinion before or after the **** clan you left to make died in a month, and you begged to get let back in and got told to **** off?

i just had a great idea, what if all the pure clans split into two teams, say, yellow and green, and then fought on a saturday to find out which of the two teams was stronger?