Clans ReOpening

[Tyler]

How do you feel about it?

 

When a clan reopens, I hope that they can live up to what they previously did, possibly even going further.

 

POST AWAY

[Gack]

Hard to get back members who went, they always seem to come back and still be in the state of just quitting.

[Anthoni]

Eh, I don't think it's right. i mean sure you want things how they were, but trying to bring it back from the grave isn't going to work out. I don't really care for it.

[Scott]

E re-opening was very successful.

 

If it works or not depends on the leadership motivation and quality.

[Rain]

Chivalry's reopening I consider to be pretty successful. The leadership I wouldn't qualify but we did surpass the original so that's good.

 

Dead clans reopen because leaders come back with ambition, boredom, possibly a goal of topping the old. I don't mind it.

[Adamant]

Doesn't work as well when the original leadership is not the main part of it. Clans with remakes that are led by members of the original or unimportant ranks aren't close to the power the original one was. It really isn't a remake anymore, it's just a new clan recruiting off an old name.

 

Epidemic actually opened up with the main parts of their leadership, so they were successful. RSD was for a while as well.

[Bloody 2h]

Ask the above said. If the Original Leader ship isn't the main part of it, then you're rebuilding a clan from dust.

[Anthoni]

Ask the above said. If the Original Leader ship isn't the main part of it, then you're rebuilding a clan from dust.

This is one of the best explanations. +1

[Bob]

Doesn't work as well when the original leadership is not the main part of it. Clans with remakes that are led by members of the original or unimportant ranks aren't close to the power the original one was. It really isn't a remake anymore, it's just a new clan recruiting off an old name.

 

Epidemic actually opened up with the main parts of their leadership, so they were successful. RSD was for a while as well.

 

Agreed.

[Ceejay]

Ultimatum are doing pretty good for just re-opening.

[Ur B L Oo Dy]

Usually it never works out how people want it too.

So it's pointless in my opinion.

[RETRO]

Its nice to see clans re-opening though as has already been mentioned; I'm not a fan of them being re-opened by anyone outside of the original leadership because they never live up to their former ability and ultimately tarnish their legacy.

[Nsfx]

See more of new clans emerging from dead clan hierarchies, rly not much of a difference besides the name in my opinion.

[Bass]

I see through this very subtle attempt to get CarpeDiem reopened.

[Toby]

All depends on how dedicated the leaders are to rebuilding it, and if they will stick with it or let it fall back to the bottom.

[blue]

2 things can happen when a clan re-opens gets alot of apps right away and pulls like 40+ in 3 weeks of being open or dosent pull 20+ in its first month and dies right away a clan that was realy good and has good historey does better newer clans with leaders that are nh and no1 likes just close Simple as that

[Brayden]

I've recently re-opened my low lvl clan untouchable, very slow start we got all of our leaders back except one, its been doing well now, so its ok, i don't mind clans giving it another shot, it shows they have ambition, and really wanna give it another go.

[Skul/Spartan/T Achilles D]

Depends on how much they want it.

[Charlie]

"reopening" is just a recruiting scheme to get the old membrs to return. It's basicly opening a new clan with the same faied leadership so depending on how good they were it's unlikely they will do as well.

[Goop]

Almost never works out, I'de be suprised to see it work out.

[Bawlet]

ut is looking very good for the re open

[badger]

It all depends on how the clan closed and how the clan reopened.

 

 

If a clan closes with a strong member base(basically a clan doing well even when it closes), then when they come back it will continue.

 

If a clan simply fizzles out of existence, most likely it will fail.

[Shroom]

Any clan that re-opens and will attempt to be what they once were, or even go further is absolutely 100% not a waste of time whether they fail or not. If a clan reopens and puts forth effort to rebuild as a clan, then maybe they'll succeed and maybe they won't, it's ultimately unpredictable because no one knows how anythings going to end up, but there are factors that will increase a clan's chance of being successful the second time around when reopening, i.e. the same leadership reopens the clan, important members with important roles return, etc.

 

But I don't see a clan reopening as a waste of time whatsoever in any way possible, it's just that clear to me.

[Brian]

Yea Like most of you said, How I see it, is if the original leadership team is leading, Has many original members back in action, and uses mostly the same event concept, then the clan should run smooth. I don't like how random pures just open a dead clan that they were not even in.

[Volt]

"reopening" is just a recruiting scheme to get the old membrs to return. It's basicly opening a new clan with the same faied leadership so depending on how good they were it's unlikely they will do as well.