[Script] Ieat's Scripts

[Ieat]

A few scripts, most people probably have.

 

http://pastebin.com/m6a28aa88 - A very basic and short script that allows you to type a mode that you would like to be set. (For example typing +m to set +m on the current channel)

 

http://pastebin.com/m549e7c3f - This script automatically unbans you whenever banned, and kick bans whoever banned you. Where it says Failed. can be customized to set your own kick message.

 

http://pastebin.com/m1e0cf741 - Count script, it does kinda glitch but still works. (it will send the person the info then say personsnick unknown command in status window)

 

http://pastebin.com/m3b94c385 - Auto identify script (right click in any chan to set your password and it will auto identify on connect. Very useful when going afk and you dc)

 

http://pastebin.com/m24356935 - Just a few different .mode commands, like .v nick to voice, .inv nick to invite someone, its easy to add more.

 

Any other scripts you are looking for just pm me.

[Anthoni]

ooo, nice.

[`JvYv]

They Look preety well written nice one.

[streetz]

Already got doze

[Phillip]

A few scripts, most people probably have.

 

http://pastebin.com/m6a28aa88 - A very basic and short script that allows you to type a mode that you would like to be set. (For example typing +m to set +m on the current channel)

 

http://pastebin.com/m549e7c3f - This script automatically unbans you whenever banned, and kick bans whoever banned you. Where it says Failed. can be customized to set your own kick message.

 

http://pastebin.com/m1e0cf741 - Count script, it does kinda glitch but still works. (it will send the person the info then say personsnick unknown command in status window)

 

http://pastebin.com/m3b94c385 - Auto identify script (right click in any chan to set your password and it will auto identify on connect. Very useful when going afk and you dc)

 

http://pastebin.com/m24356935 - Just a few different .mode commands, like .v nick to voice, .inv nick to invite someone, its easy to add more.

 

Any other scripts you are looking for just pm me.

 

For the first one, use this instead:

 

on *:INPUT:#: {if ($regex($1-,/^([+-][HalqucCEfGhjKlMNopQRsSTVzbeIkmntv]+)+/Si)) {mode # $($1-,2)}}

 

For the third one, use this instead:

 

on $*:TEXT:/^[@!.]count /Si:#: {$iif($left($1,1) == @,msg #,notice $nick) There are currently $nick($chan,0) in $chan || Ops: $nick($chan,0,o) || HalfOps: $nick($chan,0,h) || Voiced: $nick($chan,0,v) || Regular: $nick($chan,0,r) }

 

For the fourth, I use this auto-identify script:

 

on *:START: {server irc.swiftirc.net}on *:CONNECT: {if ($me == NICKGOESHERE) && ($network == SwiftIRC) {.timer 1 1 ns id PASSGOESHERE.timer 1 3 join #Chan1,#Chan2,#Chan3,#Etc}}

[Guest wcking]

can you tell us under what section to put it under? like remotes, or aliases

[Phillip]

can you tell us under what section to put it under? like remotes, or aliases

It goes under the "Remotes" section. Make sure you make a new file if it's the same type of script, like if you have two "on *:TEXT:*:#: {" ones.

[Guest wcking]

It goes under the "Remotes" section. Make sure you make a new file if it's the same type of script, like if you have two "on *:TEXT:*:#: {" ones.

if I make a new file how do I get back to the old one?

[Phillip]

if I make a new file how do I get back to the old one?

File > Load > Choose the old file

[Guest wcking]

count script doesn't work for me

[Phillip]

count script doesn't work for me

It's for a bot. You can't use it on yourself.

[Jay]

on $*:TEXT:/^[!.]count?$/Si:#: {  $iif($left($1,1) == @,notice $nick) $nick There are currently $nick($chan,0) in $chan || Ops: $nick($chan,0,o) || HalfOps: $nick($chan,0,h) || Voiced: $nick($chan,0,v) || Regular: $nick($chan,0,r) }on $*:TEXT:/^[@]count?$/Si:#: {  $iif($left($1,1) == @,msg $chan) $nick There are currently $nick($chan,0) in $chan || Ops: $nick($chan,0,o) || HalfOps: $nick($chan,0,h) || Voiced: $nick($chan,0,v) || Regular: $nick($chan,0,r) }

 

I'm a little confused by this... they should really be put as one script, ON $*:TEXT:/^[[email protected]]count$/Si:#: {

 

Not sure why you have ? in your trigger ([[email protected]]count?$), I doubt anyone's going to do !coun

 

The reason your [!.] glitches is because you have $iif($left($1,1) == @,notice $nick). Your trigger only activates on [!.], so $left($1,1) will never be @. Therefor the $iif won't evaluate and you will perform "$nick <info>", which creates your glitch.

 

To combine them:

 

on $*:TEXT:/^[@!.]count$/Si:#: {  $iif($left($1,1) == @,msg #,notice $nick) There are currently $nick($chan,0) in $chan || Ops: $nick($chan,0,o) || HalfOps: $nick($chan,0,h) || Voiced: $nick($chan,0,v) || Regular: $nick($chan,0,r)}

 

Also, one last think. Do /help $nick. You'll see that there's another parameter you can use in $nick. For example, if I'm an op in a channel, and I also have +h set on me, I will be counted in $nick(#,0,o) and $nick(#,0,h), making your numbers inaccurate. To fix this, use $nick(#,0,h,o) and $nick(#,0,v,oh) for halfops and voices, respectively.

 

I hope I explained everything clearly and you actually get what I'm saying (not saying you're not smart, I'm saying I'm not very good at explaining myself). Hope it helped.

 

- Jay

[Easy Process]

Cool 8)

[Ieat]

I'm a little confused by this... they should really be put as one script, ON $*:TEXT:/^[[email protected]]count$/Si:#: {

I had them as one script and it was messing up to where it would send it to the person twice so i just made it seperate and it stopped lol

[Jay]

I had them as one script and it was messing up to where it would send it to the person twice so i just made it seperate and it stopped lol

 

 

Try using what I posted, does it work?

[Phillip]

Try using what I posted, does it work?

Jay, you should read all of the posts on a topic before you reply. I already fixed most of the scripts for him ._.

[Jay]

Jay, you should read all of the posts on a topic before you reply. I already fixed most of the scripts for him ._.

 

I did. I figured he'd prefer an detailed explanation of the changes made rather then just throwing a script at him.

[Phillip]

I did. I figured he'd prefer an detailed explanation of the changes made rather then just throwing a script at him.

O

[Pink]

Thanks for the help ;)