Pinky Style

Wth @ 2nd picture. Employee insulting customers/kids? What is he, 12 years old? Lmao.

inb4 latest post of all time. Congrats guys, I wish when TTC was alive we could have had more fights and got along better. Can't believe I was like 17 when TTC started and we were constantly having digs at eachother. Almost 20 now and realise how stupid some of our arguments were, haha. You guys have some great members that I can remember, keep it up.

So maybe I'm out of the loop but why is someone with 31 defence and 99 prayer in a LPC?

Interesting, will be good to see what everyone comes up with..

Voted 2nd because I like the transition from colour to bnw; it's very smooth and pops. First has potential but I think the canvas is too big, has colours but isn't colourful and doesn't really have a foreground. People voting for blurring and sharpening makes me just a little mad. Not gonna lie.

^This. If you're the guy who used to hang out with Jigsaw and all that, I hate you. Otherwise, welcome to PW :thumbsup:

Voted #7 because I like what was done to the stock. Probably would have gone with #6 (assume it's Sirwat's) but I don't like that it's so heavily centered :confused:

**** you like graphics a lot :ninja: Cbf doing graphics everyday and improving; you thrash that **** like a baws.

Nice end product, I can definitely see how I do everything the hard/retarded way now.

Actors/movies in no order: Movies Shawshank Redemption Fight Club American History X American Psycho Inception (500) Days of Summer Shutter Island Memento Twelve Monkeys Gladiator ^If there are any of those movies you haven't watched, you're missing out, other movies I'd include would be Spirited Away, The Pursuit of Happyness and G.I. Jane. Actors Christian Bale Edward Norton Leonardo DiCaprio Russell Crowe Will Smith Brad Pitt Morgan Freeman Robert De Niro Viggo Mortensen Can't think of others atm.

Entering with a somewhat sub-par entry :confused:

Actually some really nice looking pieces in there.

One of the main aspects of posting your artwork in the Graphics section of this forum - or any other - is to gain feedback and constantly remove bad habits/gain important tips. As a lot of the active artists here would know, a popular way of creating an art piece is using stock images and altering/adding to/substracting from them in some way. In saying this, a lot of the stock images you will find on graphics sites have already been altered or manipulated in some way to make it better. This makes it difficult for more experience members of our graphics community, and even guests who like to comment on pieces, to give proper criticism without the original image. We don't know how good the quality of the stock was, which parts of it may have been altered through blurring, lighting, gradient maps, brushing and/or other editing techniques. For all we know, the image you used already looked astounding and you've done nearly nothing to it leading to good criticism; this would give you a false sense of accomplishment. On the other hand, you may have made a bad quality image look amazing but to us, it just looks like any other photo. In a similar process to before, we give you bad criticism when in fact you've done more than we think and this puts you into a slump. All in all, I'm just saying, asking even, that you post the original stock images you used with your topic so that everyone can see how much work you've done. We'll interpret the piece through this and give you far more effective criticism and tips :thumbsup:

Aspects of them look good but I'd also like to see the original stocks to see how much work was put into them so I can properly criticise. Might make a topic about it.

I like this a lot, the focal really stands out and emanates presence. I personally think there are minimal effects that collaborate effectively together. Only negative I'd like to point out is text placement/font. In saying that, however, by looking at it I can't see a better place to put that style of text. Maybe better left without? Iunno.

I see you making people tele. How is that a successful pure? The first guy could 2 hit you with his maul without maxing. Hell the ddsers could almost one spec you, the only kill you got was entirely luck. I guess it just matters what your own priorities are as to its success, it's not the kind of thing i could enjoy playing. ^What he said. All the video proved was that you'll have a difficult time ko-ing people. Plus, you were constant eating with a fast weapon (msb) in that video. Unless you plan on handcannon rushing (which renders the entire point of ancient prayers useless), you're going to be eating even more often OR handcannon specing and then running because you didn't get a lucky ko.

A lot of people voted for my entry but also said that it was basically just a render on top of a stock background. True as that may be, I spent over 2 hours on it with 30+ layers of blurring, sharpening, lighting, erasing and gradient maps :ninja: These were the 2 images I begun with: http://planetrenders.net/renders/albums/us...darksiders2.png http://i53.tinypic.com/2jg9lj5.jpg Outcome: So yeah, just posted this 'cause I'm insecure and shizz :teehee:

If I make something worthy of a freestyle theme in the coming weeks, I'll enter :o

Seriously don't get how Jagex did not see that coming.

who said anything about 50 hp at 75 cb? please, if you're going to comment, at least read the topic, dont just +1 i said 45 hp at cb 66 which would be 50 at 67. a max hit at that cb would be 260 260. and they wont max every time. On my 88 I could "1 bang" a zerk with dds/claws > gmaul, doesnt mean its gonna happen. Interpreted incorrectly, chill. 33 defence at 67 combat is still going to get banged by d scim -> dds or even msb -> dds. My main point that you're going to get banged still stands.

Reason I bugged my parents for the internet so much when I was a kid was because some of my mates were talking about Scape. So basically I owe a lot of my interwebz skills to the game.

Can't you just upload the .xcf file?

Pretty sure a pure at 75 combat can still 1 bang 50hp with a single dds spec on 33 defence unless things have changed epicly.

I'm thinking about vidding my tags as I work, speeding them up alot and then posting on youtube. Which I guess is kinda like a tut o.O If I did that, people would be like "wdf is this retard doing" <_< why lol The way I make tags is way too messy and clustered. Soooo much merging layers, switching around layers, making new layers for lighting when all of it isn't even necessary sometimes, haha.

I'm thinking about vidding my tags as I work, speeding them up alot and then posting on youtube. Which I guess is kinda like a tut o.O If I did that, people would be like "wdf is this retard doing" <_<