Jump to content

Welcome to Pure Warfare - The #1 Community for Pures

Welcome to Pure Warfare - The #1 Community for Pures, like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be apart of Pure Warfare - The #1 Community for Pures by signing in or creating an account.
  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get email updates
  • Get your own profile page and make new friends
  • Send personal messages to other members.

Nathan

Member
  • Posts

    613
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Nathan

  1. MAY I JOIN THIS CLAN, IM 38 DEFENCE AND HAVE 3 RUNE SCIMS TO RETURN WITH
  2. If they come back and replace 101 and ssj4, Fi might just stop being ridiculed by the pure community.
  3. Nathan

    m4n

    You should try out MM, they have a lot of unfunny people trying to be funny.
  4. EoP if you want a bigger clan that performs well in both servers, if you want to stay with smaller clans i'd try out Malice when they reopen #clan-eop #malice
  5. Nathan

    halp

    Crab helm goes well with an EoP cape.
  6. It's sad that even leaders of clans like t0xine are doing it now, but it seems that they'd rather keep the +1 than punish someone for it.
  7. MM - Speshls FOE - Walli EoP - Marty (He's all we got) TLP - Cory Fi - Don't even know, maybe John CP - Drunk
  8. f2p: 1. MM - Will gain a shitload of oldschool and probably be untouchable for a few months 2. FOE - Will also gain a lot of oldschool, but won't pull enough to beat MM 3. EoP - Won't be in the same league numbers wise as the above, but will probably be more consistent than the below 4. TLP - Huge pulls now, i think once wild comes back most of the focus will be on P2P, and if any of those p2p med clans reopen their pulls will drop 5. Fi - Should at least get some oldschool back, but i think under the current leadership won't be consistent 6. CP - Will drop opts instead of gain, probably won't compete with the above except during the week 7. M - Everyone loves them, so i see them getting a lot of momentum early 8. Ct/Z - 1 of these will die 9. others p2p; Will become about loot not clan wars.
  9. Nathan

    EF vs. EOP

    After your constant bragging in our irc over the last day, we just beat you 3-0 losing like 1 person over 3 rounds. lol.
  10. 1 def f2p matched 1. TLP 2. EoP/FOE 3. ^ 4. MM 5. CP 6. Fi
  11. EoP's leadership is a ruthless dictatorship.
  12. 35 Defence at 78 combat, who's mad?
  13. Control is probably the best clan you meet the requirements for #ctrl
  14. Another EoP psycho targeting CP on a random thread doesn't surprise me. Every thread in your sign up/reminder names CP and most of your annoucement threads does it as well, I know that the average day for an EoP member goes with targeting CP (since Goop is your role-model). Lucky for PW users every thread on this board isn't about CP but it seem that you, Nathan is struggling to figure that out just yet. I'd like you to understand that this isn't eop-rs so you might want to hit (X) top right corner and not bring all your poor attempt to flame-bait CP to PW boards. The topic asked what my clan had been doing, i answered appropriately. I'm sorry if you don't agree with my views, but labelling me a psycho because you don't agree makes you ignorant.
  15. Actually me and Pur3 Kide did that. Although you two complained about the invites, Chain didn't actually stop them until we beat you down by 10 and three topics went up in your staff forums calling for an end. Hence it was actually us that caused it. One, changed were made for the next trip when me and Kide raised our concerns. Two, you never beat us down by ten. Three, One topic was posted to discuss the situation. So you're wrong on all three accounts, I know you lap up what your leaders tell you and their world is God's truth but yeah... edit: i just noticed the irony of a white person - cp, telling them they're wrong to a latino - EOP L Pur3 kides, Andrews and Badgers. They were all deleted so you may not have seen all of them, pm an op in our irc if you're interested. Badgers topic states that hes disgusted because you lost to us with a 10 man advantage. Can't really argue with cold hard evidence.
  16. Actually me and Pur3 Kide did that. Although you two complained about the invites, Chain didn't actually stop them until we beat you down by 10 and three topics went up in your staff forums calling for an end. Hence it was actually us that caused it.
  17. LOOOOOOOOL Nice offensive sig (that you didn't even write, just took Jonty's topic and edited your name into it).
  18. Made CP go from 100+ pulls to 60 pulls in just over a month, goin pretty good.
  19. Thanks for proving my point :thumbsup: edit: Pretty bored of this topic now, thank you all for the publicity, and if anyone wants to spy, PM [EoP]Milky in IRC.
  20. No Fatality doesn't need to try to make you look bad, having that as a sig already did it. I'm just saying I think it would fall under the offensive signature rule. Offensive to who? :rolleyes:
  21. Pretty sure this topic is just an opportunity for people from clans like Fi and CP who, mad that they get steamrolled on a regular basis by EoP, felt the need to try and make us look bad. What you didn't take into consideration while making this topic is that the majority of the pure community doesn't give a ****.
  22. Doesn't seem to break any rules, if you're concerned about the rise in recent Fi forum leaks its really your problem not PW's.
×
  • Create New...