Thunderbound

Isn't this what luring is? l0l

I see, ty

The little purple haired man and his red skull

???

ex·cuse/ikˈskyo͞os/ Noun: A reason or explanation put forward to defend or justify a fault or offense. just keepin ya honest. OT: GJ Massacre....laughed heartily at the glory tele at the end of the one video.

Interested to know why the names in chat are blocked.

Well there was a clan that was lead for a while by an addy lord with 38 defence. There was another one that brought a 40 defencer to a miniwar (like 70 something combat too) and acted like it was nothing, little weird. We noticed after he tanked 5 of us and we were hitting 50% 0s on monk robes. Then there's another clan that warred pretty consistently with a certain 40 defence member(s) until they temporarily closed. These are 3 different clans.

Yea =P All my points show is that Pure clans would have equal fights with Rp/Tank clans based on clans they'd be even, but these opts are real people behind a character, people that don't like going from 1v1 being even to 3v1 being even, while the guys in rune get to be superheros.

To pures, there is no differentiation.

So basically you're interested in fighting pures on your zerker/tank? Unfortunately, no, pures are not interested in fighting you. Rune "pure" clans etc are not encouraged to participate in pure community and i believe you are actually prohibited from posting within the clan related sections about a non-pure clan. This is how i like it, 1-20 defence is ideal.

i like it, skull reminds me of dilbert animation.

You had more than 10 we had 14 and we couldn't beat you confused i am

ye we had 10, good fight demolition.

woah, soulshock, lay off there man. BV deserves your respect GJ on your win BV, too proud for words

whoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo o oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo o oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo o oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo o oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo o oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo o oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo o oooooooooooooooooosh gj negativians who were there.

Maybe, but not the Dung =)

Started this account a few months back Gotta work on range now =) and someday i hope to be able to bind =P

We do not have addy daddies, We have 1 adamant prod which is hassan. Also Known as the founder of Bv. We do 2 other addy prods, but 1 of them got hacked, and he is our main vidder. The second one has no account, so he got an addy daddy account for free, until he trains his other 1def pure, which he is currently hard at work. The rest are 1-20 I suppose. <--- A.K.A. ME :DD You're arguing over diction. You have 3 addy daddies >.> BV #1

Very nice trip BV Your sig inspired me

Would have been nice to have a clean run in, it's too bad Malice decided to crash.

yes your own picture states you have 21 or 22. Lets be honest here it was a clean run in.

gj NME, +5 is rough at those opts

I don't understand this limiting talk and disadvantage talk. It's not as if getting 10 20 or 30 defense stops you from having maxed combat stats. There is no combat cap, there is no tradeoff here. In case you haven't noticed, defense also works without having adamant actually equipped, you still get a marginal advantage from your "Non-pure" stats. -Lets mage What are pures except accounts with limited stats (defense) Clan 1 and Clan 2 have same # of members with same exact stats, both are allowed to wear any armor Clan 1 allows Addy and Clan 2 allows only Mith, they full out, who wins? Could realistically be either based on organization and luck, but who has a harder time of winning due to a variable that has no business being there in a pure fight? tis all there is to say on the subject