Reilly

Damn people are still complaining about the pure world turning to ****, it's been **** since 07.

A combination of pulls and levels. If you pull 30 people that have like a 90 strength, range and mage average then they're still MPC because they can't compete with HPC. Just use common sense retards and stop arguing about stupid ****.

speaking of english...teach* :blush: speaking of english...teach* If God can't do something, regardless of the context it's in, doesn't that challenge the concept of his omnipotence? Obviously God can't do everything. He can't stop being God. He can't choose to be evil. You're not saying anything revolutionary or crippling to the Christian faith here. Implying that I was even talking about a Christian God and not from a purely philosophical viewpoint..BUT IF YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT A CHRISTIAN GOD I'LL DEFEND HIM TO THE DEATH!!!!!!!! OT: If God is omnipotent and omniscient whats to say he's not already the essence of evil? And if God can't do everything/isn't everything, then what characteristics make him God. wat I said it wasn't something that criticized the Christian faith. Meaning, my point was coming from a Christian perspective. That doesn't mean I was insinuating that YOU were coming from a certain point of view, only that I was. How does being omniscient translate to being a part of evil? Omniscience and omnipotence have nothing to do with, as you said, being in everything (by saying "And if God can't do everything/isn't everything", I'm assuming that you're going against the notion that God is all matter, which isn't claimed by the Bible at all). Unless you meant to talk of omnipresence, yet even that only means His omnipotence reaches every corner of existence. Again, you made a large leap going from God's 'false' omnipotence/science to Him being the essence of evil. I hope what I said was written clearly. As for what makes him God, it's the fact that he's perfect. Omnipotence doesn't cause perfection, and vice-versa. The idea that God is sinless is what makes him perfect. He doesn't make mistakes. He does things for his own interest, yet isn't selfish. I don't see why you believe that because God can't make a stone so heavy that he can't lift it, it makes him imperfect. Perfection =/= Being all-powerful When you said that it wasn't something that criticized the Christian faith you were implying that I was even talking about the Christian faith in the first place, sorry if I sounded snide lol. Once again you assume that I'm coming from a Christian perspective of God when you make the point "I'm assuming that you're going against the notion that God is all matter, which isn't claimed by the Bible at all". I also meant to say he also has an Omnipresence, because if God is infinitely powerful and knowing, then logically that means he embodies both the good and evil of the world. Infinite power means infinite power, we can't just take the good without the bad because then it would not be infinite. Omniscient: Omniscience (or omniscient point-of-view in writing) is the capacity to know everything infinitely, or at least everything that can be known about a character including thoughts, feelings, life and the universe, etc. In monotheism, this ability is typically attributed to God. ... Omnipotent: almighty: having unlimited power If God is an omniscient being that has the capacity to know everything while having an unlimited amount power because he is also omnipotent, wouldn't that translate into him not only being all powerful, and all knowing, but also all good and all evil? I didn't say I didn't say that I don't believe God can't make a stone so heavy he can't lift it, it was just a question. I'm agnostic personally, but if I were to answer the question I'd say that the concept of God can't be restrained by human logic because he is great and perfect, while we are flawed.

Ok, stay on your different forums and stop bothering a community that doesn't want you or recognize you as a pure. you sound pretty upset man. You sound pretty mad, man.

Ok, stay on your different forums and stop bothering a community that doesn't want you or recognize you as a pure.

You've tried to debate your purity by making the statement that the concept of being a pure is relative to the player. Even if that is true, the majority of this community feels that your notion of what a pure is is wrong, so why bother posting here? If being a pure is relative, then go to a forum where your definition of a pure is similar to the users..

speaking of english...teach* :blush: speaking of english...teach* If God can't do something, regardless of the context it's in, doesn't that challenge the concept of his omnipotence? Obviously God can't do everything. He can't stop being God. He can't choose to be evil. You're not saying anything revolutionary or crippling to the Christian faith here. Implying that I was even talking about a Christian God and not from a purely philosophical viewpoint..BUT IF YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT A CHRISTIAN GOD I'LL DEFEND HIM TO THE DEATH!!!!!!!! OT: If God is omnipotent and omniscient whats to say he's not already the essence of evil? And if God can't do everything/isn't everything, then what characteristics make him God.

Not sure if srs..............

thats about the biggest piece of ******** as i have ever read. First off a pure is a pure. insanely low defence for high offensive. IDC there is not point in 13 prayer if your opponent is just goin to flop up overheads everytime, plus higher prayer lasts longer than 13 prayer. 13 prayer doesnt last that long in f2p battles, plus in p2p if you get smited its pretty much just a waste. A pure is not low attack. pretty much today everyone gets 60 attack for maximum damage in specs. a pure is 1 defence, but errors do occur they stack up over the years(look at mahatma hes 17 defence). most people get 20 after 11 defence for rune gloves, and better armor in f2p. fighting 20 def on a 1 def isnt bad its doable. But 30+ defence just makes it impossible without high attack bonus(whip and crossbow). 35+defence just makes it worse. Should pure clans accept 40-70 defence rangers because they max at the same combat as a max pure? no, even though you are going to yes cause u were dropped on your head as a child. You belong nowhere cause your account is obsolete. Idc if its effective, the statistics show that 40 def is more effective(no its not theory you adolescense). Almost every account in runescape is effective. its mostly just the guy behind the pker. Maybe team inc will accept you because thats the only place where you could remotely belong. *you max out at 90 combat, whereas a rp maxes out at 91* do you know how stupid that is? the bonuses are so op at 40 defence than comparing it to 30-35. With that being said the bonuses at 30+ compared to 20 or 1 are op. Loving the personal attacks; very cliche of someone speaking on behalf of pures and shows you can't hold your own without taking a debate to a personal level. Until you chill out any statement you have to make invalid; chill out... this is a runescape forum bro. You don't know the first thing about statistics...get 40 def for 1 strength bonus? thats a combat level for less than a fraction of a hit difference... if you want to say that is worth it; then the max hit difference between 40 and 45 is greater, so that is 2.5 combats. vengeance is useless on a hybrid. rune is extraneous and not needed. I'm a good hybrid and there is NEVER an excuse to switch to rune in a hybrid fight. if you are switching to rune; it's to defend against range or melee... if you are being ranged you switch to a melee weapon... if you're frozen and can't melee back you range back with no disadvantage whatsoever. If someone is meleeing you, it's time to freeze and tag with melee - if they are in dhides their melee defence is equivalent to adamant anyway... even then you can still melee hides in range armour as well with no disadvantage in the fight. /query Forty-Lashes in irc for more hybriding lessons. I think the point Celtic, like almost every other person on here is trying to make, is that your account is not pure and shouldn't (though it will be anyway, so theres no point crying about it) be let into pure clans. The concept of a pure isn't hard to understand, you sacrifice defence and prayer in order to maintain higher offensive stats. You're just using armour and weapons to make up for the fact that the account itself isn't pure, which is what mains do. I don't know what else needs to be said..

This tbh. Racism gets you? I've found that online, people show who they really are because of the internet alias they can hide behind. Just goes to show you not everyones buying into politically correct propaganda ********.

I cbf reading through these walls of text so can someone summarize them and answer this question for me? Are we arguing whether an account with 35 defence is pure or not LOL.

speaking of english...teach* If God can't do something, regardless of the context it's in, doesn't that challenge the concept of his omnipotence?

Could God create a stone so heavy that even he couldn't lift it?

What the hell does being a nice guy and "bringing something to the clan" have to do with the argument over what is too much, as far as defense level goes? I'm not sure what the argument is here? Is it if he's pure or not? If that's it then obviously I'd say hes not pure, but then let me ask you something. Does one person define a clan? Doesn't define the clan but does represent the clan. Each and every member represents the clan and makes an impression amongst other people. So he's a representation of Ch, ok. Well either you can deal with that, or you can ostracize Ch from the whole pure community, but I still see Ch out fighting pure clans every weekend. It's never going to happen, so just deal with it instead of crying about it.

I can't stand reading anything past the 2nd line; God that was bad.

What the hell does being a nice guy and "bringing something to the clan" have to do with the argument over what is too much, as far as defense level goes? I'm not sure what the argument is here? Is it if he's pure or not? If that's it then obviously I'd say hes not pure, but then let me ask you something. Does one person define a clan?

I won't say hes pure, but neither is 15-20% of the 'pure world' now a days. Life goes on. He seems like a genuinely nice guy and if he brings something to the clan then hell, why not?

edit: Let me explain this because you're most likely a newfag. Foe has always been the undefeatable pure clan in p2p, it's true that MM is getting better at p2ping because before they were totally ****. But saying stuff like quoted above makes no sense at all seeing that Foe has always been/will always be the #1 P2p pure clan. @ the unbeatable part , the only clan to secure COMPLETE dominance in both f2p and p2p servers was Fatality a couple years back; as for FO they've never been able to come close to being undefeatable lmfao? Especially when MM's around :cool: Remember when pvp first came out and for about 8 months Foe was untouchable? People forget quick..

Have you two ever gotten along.. I just remember when like Mahatma and Faken would come on Pure Community and cry "SPY, SPY" every weekend. I guess some things never change.

The best part about this is that I think both clans truly do believe they won lol.

My friend recently died from a marijuana overdose this **** needs to stay illegal..

Neither left an impact on the pure world, but if I had to choose it would be M because some of their ranks went on to be ranks in other important clans. Th or Tgg

It's a shame he chose a permanent solution to what would have been a temporary problem(s). Regardless, RIP.

ok September 28th 2010 join date

You have potential if you change your name, its gay.