Jump to content

Welcome to Pure Warfare - The #1 Community for Pures

Welcome to Pure Warfare - The #1 Community for Pures, like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be apart of Pure Warfare - The #1 Community for Pures by signing in or creating an account.
  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get email updates
  • Get your own profile page and make new friends
  • Send personal messages to other members.

Pal

Member
  • Posts

    1163
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Pal

  1. LOL also team genocide/outbreak mini a lot i think
  2. The first Epidemic vs MM pkri that wasn't a routine win for MM (MM won, however we had them worried, E won the week after)
  3. if goal line technology was used then the outcome of the match would be the right outcome.. false pw topics are merely claiming one outcome, not actually influencing the outcome. also clans care about their image, want to have as little opts as possible when they win or lose to make the victory better/defeat worse etc.
  4. Pal

    CP Vs Foe p2p Mini

    cp - best p2p clan since epidemic
  5. Because certain pure clans use 20/30 defence to gain defensive advantages over 1 defence pures in clan v clan fights that wouldnt be effective in solo pking, which is what these accounts are made for and which 1 defence is certainly the most efficient in.
  6. I'm a bandos pure Got 65 defence solely for the offensive bonus and it is closer to 1 than 70 is
  7. No they arent but neither are clans who accept 20 defence. Agree with the part of your post saying 20/30 defence shouldn't be accepted.
  8. Pal

    CP Vs Foe p2p Mini

    1st post on epic uncomprehendable topic
  9. Summer 2009 when IR had the PCT rivalry with C and then went on to fight Dv wasn't so much a rivalry as in MM vs Foe, although they were definitely competing with each other for the same spot, but it certainly brought the best out of all three clans. None of the three had ever been (or would ever go on to be) in a better state than they were at the time of those fights.
  10. Except Malice & Mayhem Makers. I don't see the point in accepting 20 defence but not 30. Sure there has to be a line where it stops and 20 is a reasonably sensible point to stop it, but 20 can't be considered pure if 30 isn't lol. I know a lot of people got 20 defence during the bh crater era, although clans did accept it before this, so there's always been a problem with defence in the pure world. This isn't a new thing, just an increase in benefits for 20/30 defence has made it more common and therefore led to more topics like this complaining about it. Anyone considered lowering reqs below 20 defence? I know a few clans have tried it such as Purity but it wasn't so successful. Even if MM were to stop accepting 20 defence I think it would be a huge step forward as a lot of what they do is copied by other pure clans. Me too, I don't see the point of accepting 30 if not 40. 40 has more bonuses thus more pure yet 30 def is accepted. There is a huge jump in defence bonus between 40 and 30. The defence bonus between 20 and 30 is the least between any 10 levels under 40. My view is not that 30 defence should be accepted into pure clans, I think 20 shouldn't be accepted, but accepting 20 is (statistically) worse than 30. Edit: Just read Pierz post, this is true
  11. haha at the dF crash, very nice job :lol: looked like a fun trip.
  12. Except Malice & Mayhem Makers. I don't see the point in accepting 20 defence but not 30. Sure there has to be a line where it stops and 20 is a reasonably sensible point to stop it, but 20 can't be considered pure if 30 isn't lol. I know a lot of people got 20 defence during the bh crater era, although clans did accept it before this, so there's always been a problem with defence in the pure world. This isn't a new thing, just an increase in benefits for 20/30 defence has made it more common and therefore led to more topics like this complaining about it. Anyone considered lowering reqs below 20 defence? I know a few clans have tried it such as Purity but it wasn't so successful. Even if MM were to stop accepting 20 defence I think it would be a huge step forward as a lot of what they do is copied by other pure clans.
  13. It's hard when every clan in our bracket cheats at any possible opportunity :rolleyes:
  14. Team Pireight (Pir8) #1
  15. I think any of the top 4 clans would succeed easily
  16. SAME TIME TONIGHT TAZE??
  17. 5.7m profit YNWA Zico.....
  18. Pal

    barrows pure

    corrupt pures made their own memberlist for their barrows pures
  19. Pal

    Searching.

    dunno why any of the previous posters are recommending those clans mm/foe are the only clans you can join that dont accept addy except maybe low level clans
×
  • Create New...