Pink

The Return of Pink has brought great joy all over the Corrupt Pures Nation! Bow down before me in my awesomeness. We have done it my children, we have done it!

Kids like you make me shake my head. 3-4 years ago was 30defence allowed in clans? did people even think of getting any defense levels passed 20? You sir, are clearly new :thumbsup: Hi Dipsy. I've been Pure Clanning since 2002. Probably longer than you. Obviously just meeting with friends and going out to pk is I guess 'clanning'. You are correct, 5 years ago, not once did I ever think about getting 1 defense, but it is the times. I got 20 defense so I have a better account. Guess what, having 20 worked out much better than being 1 defense. I of course got the Defense xp by questing. Others decide not to, and really, it is none of your business. Face the fact most clans accept 30 defense now and stop living in the past. You remind me of one of those kids with the signature of the day wildy was taken out and says "Never forget" then says "get over it" then says "no". The wild is back and has been back, so what else is there to complain about? Sorry, but 80% of the pure world isn't going to change because 20% of it says 20 and 30 and 35 defense is "NH" and calling people 'new' because they believe in it. Like I said, I've most likely been clanning longer than you, and I believe in it. Face the fact. Get 20 defense, or get caught in dust behind the rest of the pure world. That is how it goes, and if you were smart, you'd realize it. I'd rather be like MM and stick to my pure roots. 1-20def was always def reqs but what is 30def? Only reason people began to get 30 defense is more benefits i.e turmoil and handcannon and what not. I guarantee you that 30 def will eventually be the 20 def of today

Kids like you make me shake my head. 3-4 years ago was 30defence allowed in clans? did people even think of getting any defense levels passed 20? You sir, are clearly new :thumbsup: Hi Dipsy. I've been Pure Clanning since 2002. Probably longer than you. Obviously just meeting with friends and going out to pk is I guess 'clanning'. You are correct, 5 years ago, not once did I ever think about getting 1 defense, but it is the times. I got 20 defense so I have a better account. Guess what, having 20 worked out much better than being 1 defense. I of course got the Defense xp by questing. Others decide not to, and really, it is none of your business. Face the fact most clans accept 30 defense now and stop living in the past. You remind me of one of those kids with the signature of the day wildy was taken out and says "Never forget" then says "get over it" then says "no". The wild is back and has been back, so what else is there to complain about? Sorry, but 80% of the pure world isn't going to change because 20% of it says 20 and 30 and 35 defense is "NH" and calling people 'new' because they believe in it. Like I said, I've most likely been clanning longer than you, and I believe in it. Face the fact. Get 20 defense, or get caught in dust behind the rest of the pure world. That is how it goes, and if you were smart, you'd realize it.

10 being the most mad, about a 12 3/8th

You seem quite opsessed

If you have a lot of haters, you know you are doing something right.

gj on repping your hood (edgeville) aka you died a lot Looking forward to killing you again

I was there for a little before I had to go, but it was fun as ****. Did it on em

I have no idea. I suspect that it wouldn't be an easy choice. I could give you my noble assurances that I'd refuse to be part of the mass murder under any circumstances. That would be lying. I have no idea how I'd act if my life was under immediate threat, because it never has been. Use your imagination. What about instead of burying them alive, you show them mercy in the sense of the word, and take the gun and shoot them dead yourself. That way, you are saving them from being buried alive.

I do. I don't know anyone who doesn't value human life. I think that evolution has hardwired us thus, which would make perfect sense. I have another question for you. Imagine you are back in time during World War II. You are in Auschwitz near huge holes full of dead and nearly dead corpses. A German soldier is holding a gun at you and telling you to get in a bulldozer and fill the hole with dirt. You are literally burying people alive. If you refuse, you will be shot dead. What is your choice?

Or think if we would've aborted Hitler or Stalin or Saddam. Wuda shuda cuda. This piece of pro-life propaganda has a very special place in my heart, I place it right under M for moronic gibberish. Well, now I know how you really stand. I have a question. Do you value human life? Please answer truthfully

this image really makes me think Makes me wonder what all the aborted babies could have done for the world. Maybe one could have grown up to find the cure for cancer.

I was asking just that. I can't think of the single cell embryo as a baby, no matter how I spin it in my mind. Nor can I place the single moment in time when "the baby becomes a baby" near the moment that fertilization happens. Therefore the only moral dilemma I see is that it _could_ be a baby, but I don't see that any different from the first questions I asked you to answer. There could be a baby at every chance to reproduce. I conclude then that the choice you make not to have one is not immoral at that point, nor is it immoral(perhaps even less so as the woman has rights too) when a pregnant mother wants an abortion before certain irreversible point in her pregnancy. I have to also say that I'd most likely be pro-choice even if abortion couldn't be distinguished from killing a baby. There are often very good reasons behind it and I think that the woman, a conscious and moral being, carrying the fetus has the ultimate power to decide on its fate. I don't want to read news stories of women jumping down stairwells or bleeding to death with other abortion methods becomes allowing them to use the safe method is against my personal moral values. No, the very thought of that sickens me. Well, considering you are not christian, although I am not sure what Religion you belong to, it seems to me like that is just how you believe. I do understand that some women would want an abortion for reasons other than having unprotected sex. For example, if a woman gets raped, and gets pregnant, do you think she would want that baby? No, I don't believe she would. But it is different with me. My religion forbids it, and I too.

I'm sorry, I'm also a bit confused. If you are asking me when I believe a baby becomes a baby, it is at the moment the spermatozoa comes in contact and fertilizes an unfertilized egg. If you are asking me my interpretations of "pro-choice" and "pro-life", it is that pro-choice should not be allowed. If you are dumb enough to have unprotected sex, and do not want a baby, then, in a sense, you should deal with the "consequences". In no way, shape, or form am I implying that pregnancy is a punishment. Pro-life means that there should be absolutely positively no abortion. Because my opinion is a baby is a baby at conception, I also believe it is morally wrong to kill a baby even when it is in its early stages of an embryo. I believe this way because of two reasons. Firstly, My religion had led me to really believe in this. Secondly, the world was created for reason. We were not just put here to have sexual intercourse, then kill the outcome of it. We were put here to have new life. If you object any of my reasons, then so be it sir. This debate was purely created for debate, and debate alone. I am not attempting to change anyones mind. I just want to see the perspective from someone who sees the subject differently than myself.

ty 4 fights =]

It is in every sense preferable, that if we one day have to limit population growth, it will first and foremost be by choice, not by law. It is better for the children, it is better for the parents and it is better for the society as a whole. I don't see any way of arguing against abortion with purely logical reasons. Feel free to prove me wrong. You may deem it as being afraid of the process, but just as well it might be simply wanting to avoid wasting a long time of your life under painful circumstances due to one mistake, perhaps as simple as forgetting to take your pills. Thank God I haven't been one for years. Then are you against sex when the purpose is by using condoms to murder all the little spermatozoa, some of which would gladly see the day of light as smiling, innocent little babies? Or against not reproducing when you have the opportunity to, seeing as any chance to have sex with a fertile partner is a chance for new life. If your answer to those questions is Yes, I salute you as a fellow moral being with values different from mine. If your answer is No, I deem you a hypocrite, willing to go Pro-Life when it follows your fixed mindset or the ideology induced on you by your surroundings. You failed to answer the question of When is a baby a baby? I'd love to hear your opinion. Also, killing spermatozoa is different than killing a baby. I am aware that it is a living organism, but the fact of the matter is a males testicles produces millions and millions of sperm cells, but one sperm can only fertilize one egg, unless there are complications or interferences i.e twins being born or Octomom which was a result of using too many pills to help her get pregnant. Killing spermatozoa is killing a living organism, true, but then so is chopping up a piece of cancerous cells for tests. Your logic is flawed in the sense you think killing spermatozoa is the same as killing a living human being with a heart beat. Yes, it is against my religion to have protected sex. I suppose you could call me a hypocrite in the literal sense of the word, but it is not my personal belief. I am just suggesting it for people who do not want a child/children

You realize that if overpopulation does occur, which it will, there will be a certain amount of children you can have. Their doing it in China now... I think that if you are afraid of giving birth, than you shouldn't have had unprotected sex in the first place. Some women don't think they can handle the pain involved. Also, you can give it up for adoption. My school made a good point in our announcements the other day. They said that if abortion wasn't allowed, we would have 219 more friends in our school. I personally went to the pro-life march in Washington DC. If you are Christian, and you believe in Pro-Choice, than you are sinning to the tenth-fold. The question to ask is.. when is the baby, a baby. When it is conceived? When it grows limbs? When it has a face? Or when it is born? I just don't understand the difference between murdering a baby that has been born, and murdering a baby that is going to be born.

You just gotta deal with it Sandra =] Epidemic is done now. Perhaps if you did the same with NME, it would be different. Time to move on =]

The biggest debate of the modern era. I personally am Pro-Life. I would like to see what the opinions of the Pure World are. Here's a picture to contemplate

Hey Jose, remember like 2 years ago after you left SD and joined E you encouraged me to join E with you. I guess if I did, id be in NME right now. Thank God I was loyal. NME doesn't accept spastics :/ Sorry. Good job on your trip, CP! I could come back to that with "Then why are you in it?", but that is so unoriginal. I'll just stick with it. Then why are you in it?

Hey Jose, remember like 2 years ago after you left SD and joined E you encouraged me to join E with you. I guess if I did, id be in NME right now. Thank God I was loyal.

Jose, you had 30 strong, but had it not been crashed (not surprised), the outcome would still have been a loss. Do you really think 30 NME would stand a chance against 50 CP?

But you never cleared us once? :unsure: KDR Get defence and stop whining you twit. Sorry but I like staying pure. Haha then don't complain.

Did it on em Don't make excuses. Take it like a man. 0 Deaths and 4 kills today.