Manaana Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 Idts, you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Charlie- Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 this is irrelevant Corrupt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manaana Posted November 5, 2010 Author Share Posted November 5, 2010 this is irrelevant Irreleevant to what? It's a discussion about clan warfare, is it not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marc Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 The other clan would have the same disadvantages/advantages as you so why does it matter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manaana Posted November 5, 2010 Author Share Posted November 5, 2010 The other clan would have the same disadvantages/advantages as you so why does it matter? True that, but that isn't the question i asked. I don't think it's a good idea because it is a very unnatural warring scenario. You won't find any 2 clans fighting in that dense an area in pvp if they have more then 50, so 100vs100? waaaaaaat?!! Ckyle3 posted somethign intelligent on another topic in clan discussion, cba to go and quote it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asher Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 50v50s abit of a squeeze Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dissy Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 3 rounds, 2 classic, 1 turrets... all run-in. also rules need re-working they are pretty lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manaana Posted November 5, 2010 Author Share Posted November 5, 2010 3 rounds, 2 classic, 1 turrets... all run-in. also rules need re-working they are pretty lol I think that sounds quite reasonable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack-x2yz Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 The rules sound ok, but it would make more sense on classic, as classic is larger and requires tactics to win as well... Although I think the idea was to replicate fighting at dwarfs! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zany Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 id prefer all rounds on turrets. ..::PKin since classic '03 ::.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manaana Posted November 5, 2010 Author Share Posted November 5, 2010 The rules sound ok, but it would make more sense on classic, as classic is larger and requires tactics to win as well... Although I think the idea was to replicate fighting at dwarfs! I think the rules are generally OK as well. My post on foe boards - Dave your comment is so **** - seriously. Facepalm. 1 def = ok 1 round = i would prefer 3, it makes more sense in terms of ironing out the luck factor. Run in = ok Dangerous = ok Plat = what walli said [walli said plateau is stupid for a fullout] Dung off = ok summon off = i prefer off Saturday and not sunday = sunday makes more sense non negotiable = no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 id prefer all rounds on turrets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walli Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 turrets is the only reasonable map for a war of this scale really as its the biggest by miles. Classic is still better than plat because it makes you and your members think aswell. Tbh though, as far as i can see mm will only want to full out when they have spy advantage lol... They had one for j cup and warred us, they didnt have one 6 weeks later ... R.I.P Zerg feces and declined the war, now they got a couple in again they declare... hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm off topic but interesting none the less. #TEAM-WALLI Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 turrets is the only reasonable map for a war of this scale really as its the biggest by miles. Classic is still better than plat because it makes you and your members think aswell. Tbh though, as far as i can see mm will only want to full out when they have spy advantage lol... They had one for j cup and warred us, they didnt have one 6 weeks later ... R.I.P Zerg feces and declined the war, now they got a couple in again they declare... hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm off topic but interesting none the less. You're absolutely right, FOE's every loss can be narrowed down to a single deciding factor... spies! Thanks for clearing that up Walli AWARDS: - - - - - PK Video: , , , TRIP VIDEOS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack-x2yz Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 turrets is the only reasonable map for a war of this scale really as its the biggest by miles. Classic is still better than plat because it makes you and your members think aswell. Tbh though, as far as i can see mm will only want to full out when they have spy advantage lol... They had one for j cup and warred us, they didnt have one 6 weeks later ... R.I.P Zerg feces and declined the war, now they got a couple in again they declare... hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm off topic but interesting none the less. You're absolutely right, FOE's every loss can be narrowed down to a single deciding factor... spies! Thanks for clearing that up Walli *giggle* gotta admit, it is a bit of a dumb reason to decline a fullout war, but I do agree with you on the larger map front, although I'd say classic just because of personal preference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walli Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 i like jack but tbh, both jack and mark are plain stupid and retarded here lol... where did i 1 say we lost as a result of you having a spy, and where did i say we have declined it if we have even declined it at all as a result of you having a spy. yea thats right i didnt.. i simply said you only ever seem to be keen to fight us when you have one. So good one mark, next please? #TEAM-WALLI Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manaana Posted November 5, 2010 Author Share Posted November 5, 2010 turrets is the only reasonable map for a war of this scale really as its the biggest by miles. Classic is still better than plat because it makes you and your members think aswell. Tbh though, as far as i can see mm will only want to full out when they have spy advantage lol... They had one for j cup and warred us, they didnt have one 6 weeks later ... R.I.P Zerg feces and declined the war, now they got a couple in again they declare... hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm off topic but interesting none the less. You're absolutely right, FOE's every loss can be narrowed down to a single deciding factor... spies! Thanks for clearing that up Walli In f2p a spy helps alot, in p2p it isn't that much use. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toxic SlaY Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 it is if you're clan knows what they're doing but if ignorance is a factor, then i'd be scared as hell Warlord of the 1st and LAST pure clan - Mayhem-Makers.com The only High-Level Pure clan that doesn't allow 30+ Defense. P.S. We are #1 ♥ TOXIC ♥ SLAY ♥ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack-x2yz Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 i like jack but tbh, both jack and mark are plain stupid and retarded here lol... where did i 1 say we lost as a result of you having a spy, and where did i say we have declined it if we have even declined it at all as a result of you having a spy. yea thats right i didnt.. i simply said you only ever seem to be keen to fight us when you have one. So good one mark, next please? It just sounded from the way you wrote it that you were declining on that basis. I misinterpreted what you said, my bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toxic SlaY Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 lol so 4n Warlord of the 1st and LAST pure clan - Mayhem-Makers.com The only High-Level Pure clan that doesn't allow 30+ Defense. P.S. We are #1 ♥ TOXIC ♥ SLAY ♥ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walli Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 np jack, we can move on from this. British kunt! #TEAM-WALLI Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Am0n Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 I like turtles? "Practice + Determination isn't coincidence." Retired Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 Declare on MM, your rules. See if they accept. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toxic SlaY Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 Declare on MM, your rules. See if they accept. this i think they are scared no matter what the rules Warlord of the 1st and LAST pure clan - Mayhem-Makers.com The only High-Level Pure clan that doesn't allow 30+ Defense. P.S. We are #1 ♥ TOXIC ♥ SLAY ♥ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LGeeZY Posted November 5, 2010 Share Posted November 5, 2010 At least everybody knows who the real Kings of p2p are now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts