RAW LIST (Poll Vote)

[Druzzy]

Inspired by Poke's topic and based on a true story.

 

I became interested in seeing what the voting outcome would be when concerning the PCR LIST, it seems only but a few are opposed to the idea and most call for '1 Def ruling'.

 

It will take a huge majority to bring back the PCR LIST, and it really wouldn't be as hard as you think. Maybe after some pole work we will see where we land.

 

Poke's topic --->> http://www.pure-warfare.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=16641

[Josh--]

1st

[Azrael]

I think it should be negotiated like it used to be with a 10 defence rule for no agreement.

[`Pure]

ok you can make it though. have fun. a lot harder than you people seem to think.

[Eruption]

There shouldn't be any sort of def cap or restrictions, fullout should indicate both the opts and the gear, or its not a clans full strength.

[`Pure]

There shouldn't be any sort of def cap or restrictions, fullout should indicate both the opts and the gear, or its not a clans full strength.

so you would allow addy in an f2p full out?

[-Brad-]

I think it should be negotiated like it used to be with a 10 defence rule for no agreement.

[Aidan]

Yes w/ One Defence

 

PCR list should be based on organization, tanking (without special advantages; everyone is on the same play field) and general skill rather than leaning on addy for support. :@

[Eruption]

There shouldn't be any sort of def cap or restrictions, fullout should indicate both the opts and the gear, or its not a clans full strength.

so you would allow addy in an f2p full out?

y not?

[OIdwildy]

There shouldn't be any sort of def cap or restrictions, fullout should indicate both the opts and the gear, or its not a clans full strength.

so you would allow addy in an f2p full out?

y not?

 

Tell your addies to level up their non defense stats.

[`Pure]

There shouldn't be any sort of def cap or restrictions, fullout should indicate both the opts and the gear, or its not a clans full strength.

so you would allow addy in an f2p full out?

y not?

I don't think I can name a single f2p full out where addy was allowed. 20 defense has been accepted for forever so I get why people would want that, but addy hasn't and in f2p it's for defensive purposes. If you say you got it for that fog shield and that gauntlet strength bonus then you're lying. That's why. Stop sucking and you won't need the addy.

[Eruption]

There shouldn't be any sort of def cap or restrictions, fullout should indicate both the opts and the gear, or its not a clans full strength.

so you would allow addy in an f2p full out?

y not?

I don't think I can name a single f2p full out where addy was allowed. 20 defense has been accepted for forever so I get why people would want that, but addy hasn't and in f2p it's for defensive purposes. If you say you got it for that fog shield and that gauntlet strength bonus then you're lying. That's why. Stop sucking and you won't need the addy.

Times change. There was a time when no clans allowed addy, but that's no longer the case and it's foolish not to move with the times. A fullout is supposed to represent a clans full strength, but how is that achieved by restricting what people can wear?

 

And my clan is more than capable without it, i'm representing my own opinions, not that of my clan.

[OIdwildy]

There shouldn't be any sort of def cap or restrictions, fullout should indicate both the opts and the gear, or its not a clans full strength.

so you would allow addy in an f2p full out?

y not?

I don't think I can name a single f2p full out where addy was allowed. 20 defense has been accepted for forever so I get why people would want that, but addy hasn't and in f2p it's for defensive purposes. If you say you got it for that fog shield and that gauntlet strength bonus then you're lying. That's why. Stop sucking and you won't need the addy.

 

F2P has no melee weapons that hit through addy.

Thats why.

 

inb4 g2her.

[♥ Sandra ♥]

1 defence, every clan will be on the same level gear wise. With 1 defence it's down to stats, numbers and organisation which shows a clans true strenght (not relying on armour but on organisation mainly). It's the fairest thing to do. If not 1 def make it 10 def.

[OIdwildy]

1 defence, every clan will be on the same level gear wise. With 1 defence it's down to stats, numbers and organisation which shows a clans true strenght (not relying on armour but on organisation mainly). It's the fairest thing to do. If not 1 def make it 10 def.

 

 

This.

[Dan - High Rating]

why should defence benefit a pure clan? 1 def cap is the only thing that makes sense, although 20 def would be ok from my point of view, but how can you argue against 1 defence in a pure community?

[-Adam-]

1 defence, every clan will be on the same level gear wise. With 1 defence it's down to stats, numbers and organisation which shows a clans true strenght (not relying on armour but on organisation mainly). It's the fairest thing to do. If not 1 def make it 10 def.

 

1. Def is part of someones stats....

 

2. I want to have fun meaning: I want to see Titans, Dung, Turmoil.... Not some boring stuff that only reason why people complain about it is because they don't have it themselves. Go train your accounts instead of posting on pure warfare or double task like me lol. :wub:

 

3. If this crap is F2P then w.e it's going to be boring anyway, so just do 1 Def.....

[Hormone]

I think that the def cap should be decided by both clan leaders that are doing the war.

[RedemptionReturnz]

no def cap, people need to fukcing realise that a fullout war by definition is where both clans go FULL OUT on eachother using whatever the **** they want and can

[-Charlie-]

Should be a 10 def option

[OIdwildy]

Okay, then I'll make a clan accepting 45 def, call myself pure and fullout you guys. I can wear rune, because otherwise we wouldn't be at our full strength. You decline, you lose.

Then everyone will have to do the same, and 45 def will be considered pure by 2k12

 

Non flame version;

 

If a clan accepting addy declares on a clan not accepting addy, there should be a 1 def cap.

 

But thats just my opinion.

[♥ Sandra ♥]

1 defence, every clan will be on the same level gear wise. With 1 defence it's down to stats, numbers and organisation which shows a clans true strenght (not relying on armour but on organisation mainly). It's the fairest thing to do. If not 1 def make it 10 def.

 

1. Def is part of someones stats....

 

2. I want to have fun meaning: I want to see Titans, Dung, Turmoil.... Not some boring stuff that only reason why people complain about it is because they don't have it themselves. Go train your accounts instead of posting on pure warfare or double task like me lol. :wub:

 

3. If this crap is F2P then w.e it's going to be boring anyway, so just do 1 Def.....

By stats I mean, str/range/mage/attack/hp/pray :thumbsup: defence should not play a huge role in a PURE fight. So a 1 def or 10 def cap would be best. Neither clan will have a huge advantage over the other clan.

 

Because you accept it it doesn't mean other clans accept turmoil. Thus why should they accept a fight when you have the advantage of defence and turmoil. One defence would be the fairest, I'm not even talking about titans, dung and corrupt. Just about defence.

 

It's your opinion you dislike f2p. Almost all clans are both f2p and p2p based thus both types should be included in the PCR rules.

[`Mo]

1 defence, every clan will be on the same level gear wise. With 1 defence it's down to stats, numbers and organisation which shows a clans true strenght (not relying on armour but on organisation mainly). It's the fairest thing to do. If not 1 def make it 10 def.

 

1. Def is part of someones stats....

 

2. I want to have fun meaning: I want to see Titans, Dung, Turmoil.... Not some boring stuff that only reason why people complain about it is because they don't have it themselves. Go train your accounts instead of posting on pure warfare or double task like me lol. :wub:

 

3. If this crap is F2P then w.e it's going to be boring anyway, so just do 1 Def.....

If it's boring for you quit the pure world and go to the main world. Nothing wrong with that and it's much more fun.

[Excellence]

Only voted for 1 def because 10 def was not an option. Why not just have a def cap with no other rules? Like for example 1 or 10 def cap allowing summoning, handcannons, turmoil, dungeoneering. That way both sides of this argument win. Btw, if you flame me for my opinion, just realize that i don't care firsthand.

[Excellence]

Okay, then I'll make a clan accepting 45 def, call myself pure and fullout you guys. I can wear rune, because otherwise we wouldn't be at our full strength. You decline, you lose.

Then everyone will have to do the same, and 45 def will be considered pure by 2k12

 

Non flame version;

 

If a clan accepting addy declares on a clan not accepting addy, there should be a 1 def cap.

 

But thats just my opinion.

 

You go make a clan that allows 45 def and see if it is within a mile of Pure Warfare or even mentioned in the PCR list. We're all waiting for your skepticism to take a concrete stance against the pure world, so there is your motivation. Gogogogogogogo.