Fullout wars?

[aTommy]

do you believe fullout wars actually prove if a clan is better than another? because what has been happing in the most recent ones is whoever has the most old schools/elders/randoms on the ml that attend wins.. for example fi was pulling 40's with a 80 ml i think and it increased to 124 or something. do you think that clans should be able to add back old schoolers/elders to pull high?

[-Adam-]

People have lives which is why people in Fi can't make trips every sat/sun. We all have the same weapons, same food combos, and all click with the mouse. No clan is better then someone else.... It's a game.

 

And yes we should be able to add elders/old school :rolleyes:

[Adrian-]

No clan is better then someone else.... It's a game.

Which makes them BETTER at the GAME.

 

OT: Yes they should allow it because they were that clan at certain clan point but if they completely quit and left for another clan during their years of scaping, that's a different story, and it makes sense the clan with the most oldschools/elders to win because of experience, a good example is CT vs FI, CTs been open for less than a year, less experience, first fullout, and despite they were overpulled, they lost.

[Patrick]

Fullout wars dont show a clans full potential but its the closest thing to showing full potential.

[Grifte]

trips and preps show best how good your clan is, fullout wars just for the trill, enjoyment and playing with the big numbers

[aTommy]

People have lives which is why people in Fi can't make trips every sat/sun. We all have the same weapons, same food combos, and all click with the mouse. No clan is better then someone else.... It's a game.

 

And yes we should be able to add elders/old school :rolleyes:

 

so what your saying is that somebody to left FI, and who isn't on the ML, doesn't attend trips, is considered a member of the clan? i just think it's kind of stupid how fullouts are perpared for and I wanted to see what other people thought. (i'm just using FI as an example)

[BIGRYAN]

Trips.

[-Adam-]

People have lives which is why people in Fi can't make trips every sat/sun. We all have the same weapons, same food combos, and all click with the mouse. No clan is better then someone else.... It's a game.

 

And yes we should be able to add elders/old school :rolleyes:

 

so what your saying is that somebody to left FI, and who isn't on the ML, doesn't attend trips, is considered a member of the clan? i just think it's kind of stupid how fullouts are perpared for and I wanted to see what other people thought. (i'm just using FI as an example)

 

If a member of Fatality goes inactive for 2 weeks they are removed off the ML till they get back. They are still a member of the clan because they have elder, advanced, legend, mask on the site. It's a 5 year old clan most people are in there early 20's and can't play 5 to 7days a week 6+ hours a day like kids that are still in high school.

 

It really just depends on your clan: Zenith opened like a year ago so people who joined your clan are still on average about 16 17 years old. However like I said above add 5 years to that and now you hitting 19 20 21 year old. It sucks but it's w.e

[Scotts Law]

Consistency has always and will always matter more than full out wars

[bullet]

No clan is better then someone else.... It's a game.

Which makes them BETTER at the GAME.

 

OT: Yes they should allow it because they were that clan at certain clan point but if they completely quit and left for another clan during their years of scaping, that's a different story, and it makes sense the clan with the most oldschools/elders to win because of experience, a good example is CT vs FI, CTs been open for less than a year, less experience, first fullout, and despite they were overpulled, they lost.

CT is just another calamity with a different name don't pull this less then a year ********

[Iraqi Mage]

One of the perks of being an old clan is old school members who don't play Runescape and just attend important events.

[Dann]

I can never take you serious with your avatar lol :rolleyes:

 

But yea I think they should be allowed to add oldschool / elders. But i really don't think a fullout shows which clan is "better" than the other. I mean It could have been a fluke who knows. The same clan won't win preps 100% of the time, and the fullout could have been one of those times where you just get outplayed by the other clan. I don't think it puts you a step higher than the other at all though.

[-Taze-]

If all else fails...

[Hugh]

A full out should be a clan at its best, pulling out all the stops.

 

yes

[Milky]

I don't believe how 1 war could possibly determine which clan is better than the other. I do believe that the clan that shows the most consistency through out a certain period of time is the better clan.

[8loodyarch3r]

One of the perks of being an old clan is old school members who don't play Runescape and just attend important events.

 

and

 

I don't believe how 1 war could possibly determine which clan is better than the other. I do believe that the clan that shows the most consistency through out a certain period of time is the better clan.

[Seann]

I don't believe how 1 war could possibly determine which clan is better than the other. I do believe that the clan that shows the most consistency through out a certain period of time is the better clan.

I agree with this. :£

[Range-Grudge]

I laughed when you asked if elders should be able to be added back to the ML.

[Furl]

Yes fullouts show the stronger clan, no older clans should not be able to bring elders and stuff.

[Karma]

I agree with the adding of old school and **** cause like 101 said some people are to old to scape 6hrs a day.

 

to the full out...in a way , but look you got clan A who pulls 30s each weekend they got a 70man ML. Clan B pulls 40s each week with a 50man Ml. Each weekend clan A gets smacked by clan B. but Clan A declares a full out..Clan A pulls their 60 members and Clan A could only get 45.

 

Thats a 15 Man difference. so just in a way i think yes it does and also no it doesnt determine anything

[Kris]

It's a game we play for fun.

nothing more and nothing less.

[OIdwildy]

Most opts win. In equal fights, the clan with the least ammount of lagging members win.

 

If you have a problem with elders being added back, the opposing clan will just react by never clearing their memberlist. Not doing inactivity sweeps, and keeping 200-300 memberlists all day long.

[Titans]

I see how everyone in an older clan on this topic supports it, and those in the new clans disagree with it. As 101 said most of the 4+ year old clans have members in their 20's who live real lives and cannot be asked to play scape all day.

 

That being said it is up the individual clan to decided what is and what is not an oldschool member?

 

The Oldschool members attending fullouts have to be around at somepoint or else how else did they find out? Its not like this is their first time logging into scape or IRC in 4 years...

[I Serbia l]

Fullouts are usually close opted, it really comes down to who has better leaders/members

[Azrael]

There isn't really anything that shows the best clan anymore. Consistency on trips would, but it's just who returns the most (which in my opinion doesn't show a clan's strength, just their bank). Full outs are close, but like someone else said, it could be a fluke.