Nippon

Stopped reading there. This. False flag alert.

Interesting. /query Nip for AC in F2P

I'll have to go with FI on this, they've had a lot of practice with f2p full outs lately.

...because DDoSing all the ranks of the other clan and still losing 3-0 (87-0 lol) is you winning a fight Gratz on your first decent trip in 6 months, the joy won't last long.

Gratz CP, well deserved

Oh, you were expecting a clean fight? Gratz none the less FOE

^ Gratz FI

FI vs MM for F2P, FI will be the underdogs looking at previous full outs between the 2 FI vs FOE for P2P, FI are again the underdogs looking at previous P2P full outs between the 2

Np for keeping LS busy in F2P.

How many preps is that? Gratz FI

Get your facts straight. 1. I haven't scaped for a month. 2. S0 (the team) was founded 4 years ago independently by some ex-S0 members, I only heard about it afterwards 3. S0 has nothing whatsoever to do with FI, as I'm the only person from FI to pk with S0. For the sake of comparison, there have been more EOP, CP and MM members in S0 than FI members. 4. You're one to talk with the obvious proof of purposefully teaming with another main team (LS) for several months. 5. What clan are you gonna close into? I don't think anyone wants your rank team after what we've seen from you this year.

You should stop thinking.

LMFAO jesus you srs why flame l0l u suck

That I didn't know, I just assumed so because I think I've fought someone by that name in CLW.

I can see why EOP would think that 2k10 was a good year, but only because EOP was never competing at the top before that (except for a period of time at the summer of 2007), so they have no point of comparison. Same goes for clans like Epidemic which didn't even exist when clan PKing was good. Still, even for EOP 2005-2007 were the best years of clan PKing (I know, I was there before EOP closed into FI). There is a vast difference between how clans fought each other in 2k10 and 2007, those of us who were there know how and why.

Describe for me any phenomenon in our society that is beyond your understanding, and I will explain it to you without the need to introduce Illuminati, aliens or Jesus to the picture. A single one. Everything in our society is a result of people acting according to their self-interest in a given environment. If there is an Illuminati, they have seemingly done nothing but sat in a dark chamber for the past 500 years, so I'd describe them as relatively harmelss.

>best main clan >Strongdog71 LMAO. That's like saying that some random masser team from W57 is the best pure clan. Strongdog or any other RSB clan wouldn't stand a chance against any of the clans in the QF, with the possible exception of NME/FI. Again, best of luck to FI and NME, you'll need some superb tactics for this.

L2have a vidder with pub on... I wanna see the spams. Gj though.

Holy, I remember that fight. E on nip

You have a chance to win if you outnumber them 2 to 1. That being said, RSD won't pull under 50 to this.

You do realize that the whole vid you posted consists of clans hitting each other in clusterfucks then running to single? 2k10 was lame as shet. Here, take a seat and let me tell you of a time when clans fought each other in wilderness to the last clan standing.

Are you serious? Someone is a suspect until they are convicted in a court of law. There is nothing ambigious about this. The guy was a top student that graduated with honors and had never committed a crime. Considering these external factors, it is entirely plausible to speculate that he might have had a mental disorder or severe depression. This might or might not be true, but before you call it biased I'd like to hear your better explanation for his behavior. Surely if someone is a junkie it is relevant to the case, as would being an illegal immigrant or having terrorist connections, but I see no reason to blatantly lie that this person was any of those things and, fortunately for those of us who value truth over propaganda, neither does the media.

I take it that this is directed to me. It is hard to say, but the most recent estimate from CBO is that the 2010 healthcare reform will cost a net total of $1,042 billion over the 2012–2021 period. [1] However: That is to say that for the 2012-2021 period the healthcare reform will reduce decifit by an estimated $119 billion. What about other spending? ARRA and 2010 Tax Act combine to a net cost of about $900 billion. Now, for the sake of comparison, let's look at CBO estimates for some major costs in the fiscal period 2001-2011 Of course the reckless spending havoc that president Bush went on during his two periods in power is perhaps not a fair comparison, but to say that simply having a republican in power would magically decrease the decifit is just nonsense when you look at the historical context. I don't want to debate that. I find many faults in the actions of president Obama during his 3 and a half years as a president. However, loose fiscal policy certainly isn't one, not when compared to any republican president since and including Reagan. [1] http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbo...legislation.pdf ps. the picture you posted is an estimate from 2009 pps. the link you posted contains so many errors I don't know where to begin... first of all, nominal debt alone tells nothing, you have to look at the increases and decreases in spending and revenues secondly, while Obama started in office in January of 2009, most of the increase in spending in 2009 was due to laws passed by the Bush administration. Take a look at the link I posted earlier. ppps. soz PBK0 I failed to detect the irony

You do realize that the raise in budget decifit can for the most part be attributed to your last republican president? Good read: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/st...a-has-lowest-s/