Out of the result of no one understanding this topic was a joke, i'll make it more obvious by posting a recent clan discush topic by our friend p0ke N die http://www.pure-warfare.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=16322
Alright so I just wanted to make another topic about attack, if mad please click back button. The last few months has pretty much been the pure community bitching about attack and why it sucks ass, well I'll tell you right now.
So pretty much pures were originally made to be focused around one stat (e.g a ranged pure or a magic pure and then you had 60 attack with 99 strength etc.) and then a few years ago, when people started questing for dragon scim, people started to get 61+ attack, eventually so that they could use godswords. Then shortly after a bunch of clan leaders started influencing 75+ attack because of the advantages that it provided.
We as a community are 40-60 attack out of respect, or we were originally. Pure warring is a completely different ball game to main warring. If I liked main warring, I'd go join a clan on my main. But the 'speed' of pure warring makes it much more fast-paced and so as a community we sort of agreed to only allow 40-60 attack in clans.
Using 40-60 attack was always the way pures fought, we didn't allow 81+ attack because we were pure clans but also because that wouldn't be fair if we fought clans with 60- attack, I'm sure all clan leaders are leading in this pure sector because they like the style of warring.
Now with 99 attack, it's a step right past 60 and onto chaotic. And clans with 60 attack requirements that don't allow chaotic complain about other PURE clans using chaotic/korasi weapons. Well let me ask you something right now...
EOP complain about people using chaotics attacking them when EOP are 80 att.
And then EOP wonder why MM complain about the korasis when MM are 78+ attack.
The argument is that 78-99 attack has changed the dynamics of pure warring, like it or not. There are people with 90 attack in pure clans that are able hit more often than ppl with 40 attack. I mean there were probably people who got 61 attack back in 2006 but leaders wouldn't allow it out of respect. And today, go out on saturday and pretty much every clan will be there with super high attack apart from the clans who remember what it was like when we could all be civil and agree to stop it.
I mean what if MM changed to 99 attack reqs, everybody would flame them right and be like wow MM are mains now **** this. Well that is exactly what 61 att is to pure clans.
------- after this point I stop trolling P0ke's post RE: Defence --- (for people w/o a brain)
-------
EDIT: This wasn't meant to bash attack lol. Just try to compare getting 99 att to getting turmoil. Both gain the same amount of cb levels (roughly), and one is severly overpowered (turmoil).
Have the 28 def turm acc fight the max melee 1-20 def account in the same armour, and turm will hit both higher and more often. Discuss.