Jump to content

Welcome to Pure Warfare - The #1 Community for Pures

Welcome to Pure Warfare - The #1 Community for Pures, like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be apart of Pure Warfare - The #1 Community for Pures by signing in or creating an account.
  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get email updates
  • Get your own profile page and make new friends
  • Send personal messages to other members.

Clan defence averages


Scotts Law

Recommended Posts

glad to see foe still having it under 10

Expected higher from EOP.

Expected lower from CP

 

Expected just this from MM and Malice

Really? I expcted higher from CP

 

Also I'm guessing most clans don't have everyone added yet.

Founding Leader of Enemy
Officer of Corrupt Pures
Honoured Member of Epidemic
Leader of Eruption of Pures
4sleex.png
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 185
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

glad to see foe still having it under 10

Expected higher from EOP.

Expected lower from CP

 

Expected just this from MM and Malice

Really? I expcted higher from CP

 

Also I'm guessing most clans don't have everyone added yet.

 

 

This.

 

Negative's current average is 4, but we only have 32 people added atm, hopefully will drop some more once more are added.

tbGUZ.png

 

iTmiT.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this 100% accurate? Like does it pull data from hidden alogs as well?

 

I'm assuming that this tool didn't factor HF into MM's defence averages?

 

In which case i deem this topic irrelevant and inaccurate.

 

Enough is enough. It's clear to me and the rest of the moderation that you can't control yourself

OWNED LOL.

 

CP's defence average is a shame, ha.

koolssigcopy.png
Resurgence | 65+ Stat, 45+ Combat | Site | Recruitment Topic


sig4resized.jpg



#OMNI @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well at least that debunks one of MM's excuse for teaming with HF ("MM and HF's average defense level is lower than EOP's)

hf average def:61

members:42 added

61x42=2562

 

mm average def:5

members:127 added

5x127=635

 

2562+635=3197

 

42+127=169

3197/169 = ~18, also about 60 mm members havent been added, assuming that the average def will still be 5, 5x187=935

935+2562=3497

42+187=229

3497/229=15

 

MM + hf = 15

 

EoP = 14

 

Seems pretty appropriate to me.

:jay:

images1scf.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well at least that debunks one of MM's excuse for teaming with HF ("MM and HF's average defense level is lower than EOP's)

hf average def:61

members:42 added

61x42=2562

 

mm average def:5

members:127 added

5x127=635

 

2562+635=3197

 

42+127=169

3197/169 = ~18, also about 60 mm members havent been added, assuming that the average def will still be 5, 5x187=935

935+2562=3497

42+187=229

3497/229=15

 

MM + hf = 15

 

EoP = 14

 

Seems pretty appropriate to me.

:jay:

 

At the end of the day we all still say you suck...

 

99 defence tanks and Rune pures

 

Nuff nuff.






Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic should be pinned or something idk, I'm sure if the average defence level of a clan were out on show more openly than this topic clans would think about what defence level they let in to there clan and maybe try to get there average level lower. Its just like how clans work at getting there average str/range/mage up they might work to get there defence average down or I could be completely wrong.

 

EDIT: Already seen two clan leaders saying "they've removed someone who got hacked etc, recheck"

 

:)

7w5ek.png
Z4Gkv.png
fVMqV.png
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic should be pinned or something idk, I'm sure if the average defence level of a clan were out on show more openly than this topic clans would think about what defence level they let in to there clan and maybe try to get there average level lower. Its just like how clans work at getting there average str/range/mage up they might work to get there defence average down or I could be completely wrong.

 

EDIT: Already seen two clan leaders saying "they've removed someone who got hacked etc, recheck"

 

:)

 

Exactly my reason for posting the topic.

4Fdyf.png
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny I could date back 10-20 flames from the same MM member about relevant topic of defence. Leaders as well, which i'm sure have 0% warn

 

Just my opinion that his post did not deserve a ban, thats all. Suspend his posting right in clan warfare/discussion maybe, but not the entire forum for saying something that 1/2 of all pure warfare users agree upon.

[x] Group venge -- [x] Maxed Turmoil -- F2P retired

Starcraft 2 | Team Liquid

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TLP's Was 55 when MM had the name....>.<

 

It will be updated later I am sure.

{ Elder of The Last Pures }

11wacsx.jpg

{ Christ lived the life I should, and died the death I deserve. }

 

{ Proud Moderator Of PW }

Moderator.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny I could date back 10-20 flames from the same MM member about relevant topic of defence. Leaders as well, which i'm sure have 0% warn

 

Just my opinion that his post did not deserve a ban, thats all. Suspend his posting right in clan warfare/discussion maybe, but not the entire forum for saying something that 1/2 of all pure warfare users agree upon.

Report button. If that doesn't get anything solved then go to the irc and ask someone other than scribbbs.

 

PROBLEM SOLVED!

 

Unless ALL of the staff is biased towards MM...then we're screwed...

Arp-1.png
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny I could date back 10-20 flames from the same MM member about relevant topic of defence. Leaders as well, which i'm sure have 0% warn

 

Just my opinion that his post did not deserve a ban, thats all. Suspend his posting right in clan warfare/discussion maybe, but not the entire forum for saying something that 1/2 of all pure warfare users agree upon.

I am pretty mad, how about you ?

[url="http://img715.imageshack.us/i/foeop.png/"][img=http://img715.imageshack.us/img715/9552/foeop.png][/url]

Sig is too large.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Use the report button if you have a problem on your topic.

 

I warn people no matter what the clan, warned some MM kid on another topic.

On topic, it is disgusting some of the average defence levels.

I'm a fan of the 1 def pure not mith for clans.

Founding Leader of Enemy
Officer of Corrupt Pures
Honoured Member of Epidemic
Leader of Eruption of Pures
4sleex.png
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny I could date back 10-20 flames from the same MM member about relevant topic of defence. Leaders as well, which i'm sure have 0% warn

 

Just my opinion that his post did not deserve a ban, thats all. Suspend his posting right in clan warfare/discussion maybe, but not the entire forum for saying something that 1/2 of all pure warfare users agree upon.

I am pretty mad, how about you ?

 

On a scale of 1-10, I`m about as content/happy as your IQ.

 

So about a 10 ^_^

[x] Group venge -- [x] Maxed Turmoil -- F2P retired

Starcraft 2 | Team Liquid

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this 100% accurate? Like does it pull data from hidden alogs as well?

 

I'm assuming that this tool didn't factor HF into MM's defence averages?

 

In which case i deem this topic irrelevant and inaccurate.

 

Enough is enough. It's clear to me and the rest of the moderation that you can't control yourself

 

your so bias you ******* spastic

49506229.png
Link to comment
Share on other sites


×
  • Create New...